Reliability and Validity of the Swedish Version of the Scoliosis Research Society–22 (SRS-22r) Patient Questionnaire for Idiopathic Scoliosis

Danielsson, Anna; Romberg, Karin

doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3182a211c0

Cited by 38 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Cheung et al 23 preconsultation treatments, which may affect the internal consistency of that domain. Other authors 20,22,27,28 have reported high ceiling percentages in the pain domain of SRS-22, which was not observed in our study, although the patients had considerable level of pain.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 76%

Reliability and Validity Study of the Finnish Adaptation of Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire Version SRS-30

Kyrölä

Salme

Ylinen

et al. 2017

Spine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 76%

Reliability and Validity Study of the Finnish Adaptation of Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire Version SRS-30

Kyrölä

Salme

Ylinen

et al. 2017

Spine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The disease-specific SRS-22r contains 22 questions covering five domains: function/activity, pain, self-perceived image, mental health, and satisfaction with treatment, scored from 1 (worst) to 5 (best) [17]. The 20 questions related to the first four domains were analyzed in this study and collated to make the SRS-22r subscore.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An observational study on surgically treated adult idiopathic scoliosis patients’ quality of life outcomes at 1- and 2-year follow-ups and comparison to controls

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundProspective data on health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated surgically as adults is needed. We compared preoperative and 1- and 2-year follow-up data in surgically treated adults with idiopathic scoliosis with juvenile or adolescent onset. Results were compared to untreated adults with scoliosis and population normative data.MethodsA comparison of preoperative and 1- and 2-year follow-up data of 75 adults surgically treated for idiopathic scoliosis at a mean age of 28 years (range 18 to 69) from a prospective national register study, as well as a comparison with age- and sex-matched data from 75 untreated adults with less severe scoliosis and 75 adults without scoliosis, was made. Outcome measures were EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r questionnaire.ResultsIn the surgically treated, EQ-5D and SRS-22r scores had statistically significant improvements at both 1- and 2-year follow-ups (all p < 0.015). The effect size of surgery on EQ-5D at 1-year follow-up was large (r = −0.54) and small-medium (r = −0.20) at 2-year follow-up. The effect size of surgery on SRS-22r outcomes was medium-large at 1- and 2-year follow-ups (r = −0.43 and r = −0.42 respectively). At the 2-year follow-up, the EQ-5D score and the SRS-22r subscore were similar to the untreated scoliosis group (p = 0.56 and p = 0.91 respectively), but lower than those in the adults without scoliosis (p < 0.001 for both comparisons).ConclusionsAdults with idiopathic scoliosis experience an increase in health-related quality of life following surgery at 2-year follow-up, approaching the health-related quality of life of untreated individuals with less severe scoliosis, but remain lower than normative population data.

show abstract

“…Questionnaires SRS-22r is a scoliosis specific instrument developed aiming to measure quality of life outcomes in scoliosis patients. It has been translated to Swedish and has been tested regarding reliability and validity [12]. The questionnaire comprises 22 questions distributed over five domains (function, pain, self-image, mental health and satisfaction) and each domain has five answers (one being the worst and five the best).…”

Section: Individualsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Population-based normative data for the Scoliosis Research Society 22r questionnaire in adolescents and adults, including a comparison with EQ-5D

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Reliability and Validity of the Swedish Version of the Scoliosis Research Society–22 (SRS-22r) Patient Questionnaire for Idiopathic Scoliosis

Abstract: N/A.

Cited by 38 publications

References 33 publications

Reliability and Validity Study of the Finnish Adaptation of Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire Version SRS-30

Reliability and Validity Study of the Finnish Adaptation of Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire Version SRS-30

An observational study on surgically treated adult idiopathic scoliosis patients’ quality of life outcomes at 1- and 2-year follow-ups and comparison to controls

Population-based normative data for the Scoliosis Research Society 22r questionnaire in adolescents and adults, including a comparison with EQ-5D

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About