2016
DOI: 10.1037/pas0000154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the Danish version of the Schema Mode Inventory (SMI).

Abstract: Schema modes are conceptualized as different parts of oneself, related to specific emotions, cognitions, and behaviors. They are a central concept in schema therapy for personality pathology and other chronic psychiatric disorders. Prior research confirms the factorial validity of the Schema Mode Inventory (SMI), an instrument to assess schema modes. This study presents an evaluation of the Danish version of the SMI, including reliability and validity analyses. Psychometric properties, such as factor structure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
10
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean item loadings of each subscale were also acceptable, with a global item loading mean of .62. Similar results were obtained in previous research Reiss et al 2012Reiss et al , 2015, with lower results for the same item. The mean inter-item correlations varied from .19 to .59 and had a low mean of .32.…”
Section: Internal Consistencysupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The mean item loadings of each subscale were also acceptable, with a global item loading mean of .62. Similar results were obtained in previous research Reiss et al 2012Reiss et al , 2015, with lower results for the same item. The mean inter-item correlations varied from .19 to .59 and had a low mean of .32.…”
Section: Internal Consistencysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, RMSEA had an acceptable value. This finding was successfully confirmed by previous researchers Reiss et al 2012;Reiss et al 2015). The results confirmed both configural invariance of the 14-factor model across clinical and nonclinical participants (χ 2 = 30633.164 (13388, n = 654), p < .001; NNFI = .919; CFI = .922; RMSEA = .060) and the equality of factor loadings and factor correlations across groups (χ 2 = 32419.233 (13597, n = 654, p < .001; NNFI = .917; CFI = .919; RMSEA = .063; ΔCFI = .003), showing an adequate fit (Cheung and Rensvold 2002).…”
Section: Factor Structure Of the Smisupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of the SMI supports its internal consistency, factorial validity, convergence with global psychopathology, and ability to appropriately discriminate between subgroups [42]. However, the Danish study failed to support the factorial validity of the Detached Self-Soother mode [42]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%