2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the TAPQOL: A health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instrument for 1- to 5-year-old children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
31
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…25 TAPQOL is a generic, non-disease specific and multidimensional quality-of-life tool for measuring parents' perceptions of health-related quality of life in preschool children, with an acceptable reliability and validity. [26][27][28] In general, an ideal disability weight would have been generated specifically from the EV71 infection population using any of the standard techniques. However, there were no such disability weights available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 TAPQOL is a generic, non-disease specific and multidimensional quality-of-life tool for measuring parents' perceptions of health-related quality of life in preschool children, with an acceptable reliability and validity. [26][27][28] In general, an ideal disability weight would have been generated specifically from the EV71 infection population using any of the standard techniques. However, there were no such disability weights available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we used 4 CFA models (Models 1, 4, 5, and 6) to test convergent and discriminant validity: high factor loadings on each Kid-KINDL subscale suggested satisfactory convergent validity; low correlation coefficients among different subscales indicated good discriminant validity [28]. However, because the acceptable factor loadings (for convergent validity) and correlation coefficients (for discriminant validity) may be varied among different fields, we proposed the cutoff of .3 for factor loadings and .7 for correlation coefficients [29] in this study. In other words, a factor loading < .3 indicates that an item is not well fit in its subscale; a correlation coefficient > .7 between two subscales suggests that the two subscales are not discriminant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the ability of the instrument to classify preterm from term children was restricted only to six subscales. However, a similar issue was observed in the validation of the tool in other countries whenever they had tried to establish discriminant validity using preterm and term born children [7,28]. This problem was explained by lack of variability of the measured health outcome in the said population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%