2003
DOI: 10.3171/foc.2003.15.4.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability assessment of computerized tomography scanning measurements in intracerebral hematoma

Abstract: Object As one of the aspects of the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH), prerandomization computerized tomography (CT) scans were collected. In the present study the authors determined the inter-and intraobserver variability of various parameters pertinent to CT scans obtained in patients with intracerebral hematomas (ICHs). Methods A protocol was devised to analyze CT scans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose to use the surrogate measurement of MLS as it is a fairly concrete calculation and has been shown to be stable across interpreters. (30) In contrast, volumetric measurement of cerebral edema by CT can be inconsistent and unreliable after ICH. (31) In agreement with prior studies, (32, 33) MLS correlated with poor functional outcome, which in our cohort consisted of mRS and GOS at time of hospital discharge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose to use the surrogate measurement of MLS as it is a fairly concrete calculation and has been shown to be stable across interpreters. (30) In contrast, volumetric measurement of cerebral edema by CT can be inconsistent and unreliable after ICH. (31) In agreement with prior studies, (32, 33) MLS correlated with poor functional outcome, which in our cohort consisted of mRS and GOS at time of hospital discharge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the mICH score takes hydrocephalus into account, we excluded this because we felt that the presence or absence of this CT finding is subjective and has been shown to have poor interobserver agreement in this setting. 12 The survival status and date of death of nonsurvivors were obtained on October 21, 2011, via the Medical Research Information Service, Southport, United Kingdom, allowing a minimum follow-up period of 370 days for all cases. Data collection and image analysis were conducted before collection of survival data and were thus blinded to outcome.…”
Section: Clinical Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high variability in those studies was attributed to the subjective interpretation of the presence or absence of hydrocephalus. [27] There are numerous quantitative methods to evaluate hydrocephalus but VCR is now being increasingly used as a substitute for subjective analysis. Van Zagten et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%