2021
DOI: 10.5958/0974-083x.2021.00033.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of age estimation using periodontal ligament visibility in South Indian Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, future comparative studies need to clarify whether the Guo method is superior in targeted cohorts and whether the correlation with age is better in these cohorts. A first validation study in a South Indian population from 2021 by Ray et al reports correlations of 0.455 to 0.555 for the Guo method [ 58 ]. Overall, the use of the Guo method can be considered a viable alternative in cases where the inter-radicular periodontal ligament is not evaluable, such as it is the case with fused roots which preclude the use of the Olze or Lucas method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, future comparative studies need to clarify whether the Guo method is superior in targeted cohorts and whether the correlation with age is better in these cohorts. A first validation study in a South Indian population from 2021 by Ray et al reports correlations of 0.455 to 0.555 for the Guo method [ 58 ]. Overall, the use of the Guo method can be considered a viable alternative in cases where the inter-radicular periodontal ligament is not evaluable, such as it is the case with fused roots which preclude the use of the Olze or Lucas method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies using the Olze method have examined far in excess of two thousand individuals in various populations [ 28 , 36 39 , 53 , 54 ]. In contrast, the methods presented by Lucas et al and Guo et al are supported in particular by the studies of their first description [ 48 , 49 ] or in single smaller studies [ 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%