2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of diagnoses coding with ICD-10

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
88
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
88
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the ICD-10 is the international standard diagnostic classification system of diseases and recommended for epidemiologic studies, with high reliability at the category level. 72 The presented findings should be corroborated in a sufficiently large sample of higher-order pregnancies before generalizing them to multiples. As we did not have diagnostic information from general practitioners regarding child pathologies, we probably missed lesssevere offspring diseases and the relation with asthma during pregnancy may be lower in these cases.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 62%
“…However, the ICD-10 is the international standard diagnostic classification system of diseases and recommended for epidemiologic studies, with high reliability at the category level. 72 The presented findings should be corroborated in a sufficiently large sample of higher-order pregnancies before generalizing them to multiples. As we did not have diagnostic information from general practitioners regarding child pathologies, we probably missed lesssevere offspring diseases and the relation with asthma during pregnancy may be lower in these cases.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 62%
“…However, some critics have pointed out a number of ambiguities and inconsistencies in these rules 8,16,19,20 and concerns about the quality of the coding process persist 5,6 given the observed influence of factors such as the coder's skill level and the level and continuity of coder training. The literature also suggests that differences in interpretation of coding rules result in discrepancies in intercoder agreement 5,7,10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some derive from ambiguities and inconsistencies of the ICD-10, but arguably most relate to differences in training and skills, and the interpretation of the ICD guidelines by coders 3,7,8,9 . Studies of intercoder agreement show varying levels of agreement in relation to code classification level, the number of causes of death recorded on the death certificate, and the age of the deceased 3,7,10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of possible quality errors in the diagnostic coding process that have been shown in previous studies is unknown. [7][8][9][10][11] Far from all concepts have attributes in SNOMED CT. Also, the SNOMED CT structure has not been checked by the authors, but has been accepted as is for the purpose of this study.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Furthermore, both low reliability between coders and coding inaccuracy have been documented. 7,8 However, high reliability, correctness and completeness have also been reported. [9][10][11] ICD has become the standard international diagnostic classification for all general epidemiological purposes and many health management purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%