2020
DOI: 10.1177/1055665619894497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of Speech Variables and Speech-Related Quality Indicators in the Swedish Cleft Lip and Palate Registry

Abstract: Objective: To assess the reliability of speech variables and speech-related quality indicators in the Swedish quality registry for cleft lip and palate (CLP). Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Primary care university hospitals. Participants: Fifty-two 5-year-old children with unilateral CLP and 41 with bilateral CLP. Main Outcome Measures: Registry data for “percent nonoral errors” and “perceived velopharyngeal competence” (VPC) were compared to reassessments by 4 independent judges based on audio recordin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Percentage measures of consonant production have been widely used in cleft palate speech research [27]. In the study by Brunnegård et al [29], agreement between judges for the percentage of correct consonants was excellent, with a singlemeasures intra-class coefficient of 0.85. Further, reliability of data on the percentage of non-oral errors in the CL/P registry was excellent in the study by Brunnegård et al, and in a previous study [31].…”
Section: Speech Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Percentage measures of consonant production have been widely used in cleft palate speech research [27]. In the study by Brunnegård et al [29], agreement between judges for the percentage of correct consonants was excellent, with a singlemeasures intra-class coefficient of 0.85. Further, reliability of data on the percentage of non-oral errors in the CL/P registry was excellent in the study by Brunnegård et al, and in a previous study [31].…”
Section: Speech Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceived velopharyngeal competence, i.e., an overall assessment of hypernasality, audible nasal air leakage and weak articulation, is rated on a three-point scale with the scale values 'competent/ sufficient', 'marginally incompetent/insufficient' and 'incompetent/insufficient' [27]. Perceived velopharyngeal competence has previously been validated [28], and in a study by Brunnegård et al [29], the reliability of data on perceived velopharyngeal competence in the CLP registry was good to excellent. The percentage of consonants correct and percentage of non-oral speech errors are recorded [27], based on phonetic transcriptions according to the International Phonetic Alphabet [30], for the 59 target consonants in SVANTE [27].…”
Section: Speech Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies have assessed the reliability of speech data in the Swedish CLP registry [ 21 – 23 ]. Brunnegård et al [ 22 ] assessed the reliability of data on perceived velopharyngeal competence in the CLP registry, which was good to excellent. Furthermore, data on percentage consonants correct and percentage non-oral speech errors have been proven to be satisfying [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%