2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2019.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of standardized reporting system of acute appendicitis in adults at low-dose 320-rows CT

Abstract: AimTo assess the reliability of a standardized reporting system of acute appendicitis at low-dose 320-rows CT.Subjects and MethodsRetrospective analysis CT of 78 patients with pathologically proven acute appendicitis. The study was performed at a low-dose 320-rows CT. The image analysis was performed by 2 radiologists according to a standardized reporting system of acute appendicitis.ResultsThere was an excellent overall of the inter-observer agreement of both observers for the standardized reporting system of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The median AppD was significantly higher in the perforated AA group, which is consistent with recent studies. PALC was observed significantly more often in the perforated AA group, and this is also supported by the existing literature [ 40 , 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The median AppD was significantly higher in the perforated AA group, which is consistent with recent studies. PALC was observed significantly more often in the perforated AA group, and this is also supported by the existing literature [ 40 , 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Many factors may contribute to the improved prognosis of IBD, such as increased awareness of early detection and intervention, improved access to healthcare providers, improved surveillance system, and evolved treatment strategies. Image techniques including magnetic resonance enterography, virtual computed tomography colonoscopy have been upgraded to better facilitated IBD clinical management [10][11][12]. At the start of our study period, treatment options and strategies were different from now.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%