2022
DOI: 10.1186/s40945-022-00133-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of the PEDro scale: comparison between trials published in predatory and non-predatory journals

Abstract: Background Lack of effective peer-review process of predatory journals, resulting in more ambiguity in reporting, language and incomplete descriptions of processes might have an impact on the reliability of PEDro scale. The aim of this investigation was to compare the reliability of the PEDro scale when evaluating the methodological quality of RCTs published in predatory (PJs) and non-predatory (NPJs) journals, to more confidently select interventions appropriate for application to practice. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale (PEDro), TIDieR (Template for Intervention Description and Replication) and, nally, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) checklists were used to assess the risk of bias, completeness of intervention descriptions and quality of evidence, respectively. Using the PEDro scale [33], the listed studies' methodological quality was evaluated by the investigator (DS). The PEDro scale consists of 11 items designed to assess methodological quality.…”
Section: Methodological Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale (PEDro), TIDieR (Template for Intervention Description and Replication) and, nally, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) checklists were used to assess the risk of bias, completeness of intervention descriptions and quality of evidence, respectively. Using the PEDro scale [33], the listed studies' methodological quality was evaluated by the investigator (DS). The PEDro scale consists of 11 items designed to assess methodological quality.…”
Section: Methodological Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items 2 through 11 are about the internal validity, statistics, and outcome measures of the study. Informatively, a clinical trial is regarded as moderate-to-high quality when the total score is at least 6 out of 10 [16]. In the current systematic review, the evaluation of the methodological quality of the studies was carried out by ten independent researchers.…”
Section: Methodological Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scale [67], considered the internal validity of the research. Additionally, statistical reporting played a crucial role in shaping the review's decision.…”
Section: Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale (Pedro)mentioning
confidence: 99%