Reliability, Risk Management, and Contingency of Construction Processes and Projects / Statybos Procesų Ir Projektų Patikimumas, Rizikos Ir Atsitiktinumų Valdymas

Abstract

<jats:p>The paper presents the evolution of concepts, an overview of research and applications pertaining to reliability in construction production, the use of reserves, robust itineraries, and contingency of time and cost. It describes areas of management advisory systems in relation to the cycle of risk analysis. The article also presents the main trends in different approaches to risk management in construction and construction project processes, such as reliability of production, discount methods, methods of reporting, integrated management together with trends towards standardisation of the investment process management. The discussion is embedded in the specific context: the achievements of trilateral academic colloquia, with participation of Lithuania, Germany and Poland, and a review of work by Professor Kapliński, the chair of the Polish delegation to the aforementioned colloquia. Santrauka Straipsnyje pateikiama koncepcijų raida, mokslinių tyrimų ir taikomųjų programų, susijusių su statybos produkcijos pati-kimumu, atsargų, patikimų maršrutų bei laiko ir lėšų naudojimo nenumatytais atvejais, apžvalga. Aprašomos valdymo konsultavimo sistemų sritys, atsižvelgiant į rizikos analizės ciklą. Straipsnyje taip pat apžvelgiamos pagrindinės skirtingų požiūrių į rizikos valdymą statybos ir statybos projektavimo procesų metu tendencijos, pavyzdžiui, gamybos patikimumo, diskonto metodai, atskaitomybės metodai, integruotas valdymas bei investicinio proceso valdymo standartizavimo ten-dencijos. Diskusija pateikiama specifiniame trišalio akademinio bendradarbiavimo, dalyvaujant Lietuvai, Vokietijai ir Lenkijai, bei Lenkijos delegacijos pirmininko profesoriaus Kapliński pasiekimų kontekste.</jats:p>

A Fuzzy Analytic Network Process Method for Risk Prioritization in Freeway PPP Projects: An Iranian Case Study

“…All above introduced along with a number of other examples indicate that lack of evaluating relationships and feedback among risks on project objectives is one of the reasons behind the weak accuracy of risk assessment and risk analysis of construction projects and PPP projects (Nasirzadeh et al 2008;Tang et al 2011;Peckiene et al 2013;Turskis et al 2012). To support this, Zegordi et al (2012) developed a FANP-TOPSIS method for the risk assessment of EPC power plant project risks in Iran focusing on dependency and feedback among different criteria for risk assessment such as probability and impact.…”

Hybrid Flexible Approach for Six Sigma Implementation in Constructional Sme

“…One example is the approach of Lean Six Sigma. In the hybrid approach, different problems could be taken into considerationÁ multicriteria analysis , risk management (Kashiwagi et al 2009;Turskis et al 2012), and, technological development ( In the integrated approach to Lean Six Sigma (Han et al 2008) the typical activities resulting from the Lean Management concept, like:…”

Innovative Solutions in Construction Industry. Review of 2016–2018 Events and Trends

“…This synthesis uses earlier individual own research (Kapliński, 2008(Kapliński, , 2009(Kapliński, , 2015Kapliński & Peldschus, 2011) and team research: Gajzler (2016), Dziadosz, Tomczyk, and Kapliński (2015), Dziadosz and Kończak (2016), Kalibatas, Kalibatienė, and Kapliński (2018), Turskis, Gajzler, and Dziadosz (2012), Zavadskas, Turskis, and Tamošaitiene (2008), Zima and Leśniak (2013).…”