2011
DOI: 10.1587/transele.e94.c.231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarks on Transient Amplitude Analysis of MOS Cross-Coupled Oscillators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Abbasalizadeh and Miar-Naimi, 8 the -G m cells with different currents cause different SWOs with different amplitudes. Using the SWO voltage amplitude proposed by previous works 8,17 derives the RTWO phase error formula due to the inequality of -G m cell currents Using the Abbasalizadeh and Miar-Naimi 8 claims that in the RTWO with phase error, we can produce an error to cancel the primary phase error. This error and the initial phase error should have the same amplitude with opposite signs to cancel each other.…”
Section: The Analysis Of the Phase Error Compensation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Abbasalizadeh and Miar-Naimi, 8 the -G m cells with different currents cause different SWOs with different amplitudes. Using the SWO voltage amplitude proposed by previous works 8,17 derives the RTWO phase error formula due to the inequality of -G m cell currents Using the Abbasalizadeh and Miar-Naimi 8 claims that in the RTWO with phase error, we can produce an error to cancel the primary phase error. This error and the initial phase error should have the same amplitude with opposite signs to cancel each other.…”
Section: The Analysis Of the Phase Error Compensation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us first consider the case that the circuit parameters lead to a saturation‐like characteristic for i nl ( v ), as shown in Figure (a). Thus, in absence of injection, that is, v in = 0, we have i ( v , v in ) = i nl ( v ) ≈ − I 0 sgn( v ) , where I 0 can be estimated starting from the measured or simulated voltage–current characteristic of the active part of the ILFD, that is, i ( v , v in ).…”
Section: Analysis Of a Complementary Differential Lc Injection‐lockedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us first consider the case that the circuit parameters lead to a saturation-like characteristic for i nl (v), as shown in Figure 4(a). Thus, in absence of injection, that is, v in = 0, we have i(v,v in ) = i nl (v) % À I 0 sgn (v) [16][17][18][19], where I 0 can be estimated starting from the measured or simulated voltage-current characteristic of the active part of the ILFD, that is, i(v,v in ). Then, if a signal v in 6 ¼ 0 is applied into the gate of the tail device, the voltage-current characteristic is modified and the function g(v) defined in (5), which takes into account the dependence of the ILFD nonlinearity from the input signal, can be estimated approximating the derivative through a finite difference between two measured or simulated voltage-current characteristics obtained for small and constant values of v in , that is,…”
Section: Saturation-like Nonlinearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the active part of the frequency divider can be modelled by a saturation-like nonlinearity [15][16][17], that is, (V, V in ) = − 0 (1 + V in ) sign(V), the following coefficients are obtained for the harmonics nl = −4 0 / , in0 = 0, 1 = nl , and 3 = − 1 /3, and model (17) leads to the following:…”
Section: Saturation-like Nonlinearitymentioning
confidence: 99%