Remembering and Communicating Climate Change Narratives – The Influence of World Views on Selective Recollection

Abstract

We examine how people remember stories about climate change and how they communicate these stories to others. Drawing on theories of reconstructive memory and cultural theory, we assume that recollection is systematically affected by an individual’s world view as well as by the world view of the target audience. In an experimental study with a Norwegian representative sample ( N = 266), participants read a story about three politicians, in which each protagonist was described as holding a specific world view and as trying to tackle climate change with a corresponding strategy (individualistic/free market oriented, hierarchical/technology-oriented, or egalitarian/sustainability-oriented). After 1 day and then after 1 week, participants were asked to retell the story as if to somebody who was characterized as being either an individualist, a hierarchist, or an egalitarian; in addition, a neutral recall control condition without a specified audience was included. Participants’ own world view was assessed and they were classified as endorsing individualism, or hierarchism, or egalitarianism. We hypothesized that retellings would be selectively reconstructed according to the world view of the participant, as well as tuned to the audience’s world view. We assessed the cognitive structure of the recollected story, and, using methods from computational text analysis, we computed similarities among retellings and the original narrative, and among retellings and world views. Results suggest that (i) retellings become less accurate over time, (ii) retelling to an audience with an explicit world view leads to more strongly filtered retellings than recalling without a specified audience, but the filter operates in a non-specific manner with respect to world views, (iii) the cognitive structure of the recollected story shows small but systematic differences concerning the link between story problem and solution as a function of the participant’s and the audience’s world view. No interaction was found between the world view of the participant and that of the audience. Results emphasize the role of world views in communicating climate change, and might help to better understand phenomena such as polarization and echo chamber effects.

Communicating Climate Change to Alberta’s Youth: Lessons Learned from the Alberta Narratives Project

“…A foundational principle of the ANP is that narrative is vital to the way that people comprehend the world (Shaw and Corner 2017 ). According to Böhm et al ( 2019 ), narratives are more likely to “represent people’s understanding of climate change” than scientific facts (paragraph 8). Through narrative, people contextualize their understandings and beliefs, so narrative can act as a tool to understand how best to communicate about climate change.…”

Evidence-based recommendations for communicating the impacts of climate change on health

“…Narrative storytelling has power in delivering information related to climate change and, independently, to health [112][113][114][115]. Its effectiveness as a tool to modify beliefs and behaviors at the intersection of climate change and health has not been examined but may be particularly valuable in communicating information and motivating health behavior and climate change mitigating actions.…”

Why Do UNESCO Biosphere Reserves Get Less Recognition than National Parks? A Landscape Research Perspective on Protected Area Narratives in Germany

“…A promising approach for this purpose is the concept of narrative. The analysis of narratives and public perceptions is more common and more advanced in climate research [22][23][24][25][26] than in the field of biodiversity conservation, but the concept of narratives has already been used to analyse conservation concepts; for example, by Abelson [27] and by Hutton et al [28], who contrast integrative and exclusionary conservation concepts and state that "changes in narratives have had profound impacts upon conservation and natural resource management, livelihood strategies and political processes" [28]. Shultis and Heffner also compare different protected area concepts, contrasting wilderness and cultural landscape narratives [9].…”