Remodelling pattern of the ramus on submentovertex cephalographs after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy

Choi, Young Soo; Jung, Harald; Kim, Sang Yoon; Park, Hyung-Sik; Jung, Young-Soo

doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.08.003

Cited by 8 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Next, the saw blade was directed anterosuperiorly toward the sigmoid notch. 13,14 The patients' sutures were removed, and radiographs were taken postoperatively within 7 days.…”

Section: Q4mentioning

confidence: 99%

Stability of Pre-Orthodontic Orthognathic Surgery Using Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Versus Conventional Treatment

Choi

Hwang

Baik

et al. 2016

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Next, the saw blade was directed anterosuperiorly toward the sigmoid notch. 13,14 The patients' sutures were removed, and radiographs were taken postoperatively within 7 days.…”

Section: Q4mentioning

confidence: 99%

Stability of Pre-Orthodontic Orthognathic Surgery Using Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Versus Conventional Treatment

Choi

Hwang

Baik

et al. 2016

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Therefore, it is necessary to develop a standardized diagnostic standard and classification method for TMD through systematic and well-designed research56. The following are the most mutually agreed upon opinions among scholars57585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103.…”

Section: Postoperative Complicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Complications associated with orthognathic surgery

Kim

2017

J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg

118

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While most patients undergo orthognathic surgery for aesthetic purposes, aesthetic improvements are most often followed by postoperative functional complications. Therefore, patients must carefully decide whether their purpose of undergoing orthognathic surgery lies on the aesthetic side or the functional side. There is a wide variety of complications associated with orthognathic surgery. There should be a clear distinction between malpractice and complications. Complications can be resolved without any serious problems if the cause is detected early and adequate treatment provided. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons must have a full understanding of the types, causes, and treatment of complications, and should deliver this information to patients who develop these complications.

show abstract

“…From this point of view, lateral rotation of condyle after IVRO is very effective improving TMJ symptoms. Choi et al [ 108 ] evaluated 200 patients' postoperative changes in proximal segment and condyles on the transverse plane after IVRO using submentovertex cephalogram. This study reported 15.05 (SD: 8.97)° of postoperative lateral rotation of condyles which slowly returned towards the original position, yet 4.53 (SD: 6.03)° of lateral rotation remained at 1 year.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Condylar sagging can be avoided with careful dissection during the ramus osteotomy and not violating condylar capsules. In fact, the changes in the intercondylar distance on transverse plane after IVRO is not significant [ 108 ]. Excessive interference between the segments can induce sagging, thus reduction of bony interference or using a modified osteotomy design should be considered [ 109 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Orthognathic surgery and temporomandibular joint symptoms

Jung

Kim

Park

et al. 2015

Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this article is to review temporomandibular joint symptoms as well as the effects of orthognathic surgery(OGS) on temporomandibular joint(TMJ). The causes of temporomandibular joint disease(TMD) are multifactorial, and the symptoms of TMD manifest as a limited range of motion of mandible, pain in masticatory muscles and TMJ, Joint noise (clicking, popping, or crepitus), myofascial pain, and other functional limitations. Treatment must be started based on the proper diagnosis, and almost symptoms could be subsided by reversible options. Minimally invasive options and open arthroplasty are also available following reversible treatment when indicated.TMD manifesting in a variety of symptoms, also can apply abnormal stress to mandibular condyles and affect its growth pattern of mandible. Thus, adaptive developmental changes on mandibular condyles and post-developmental degenerative changes of mandibular condyles can create alteration on facial skeleton and occlusion. The changes of facial skeleton in DFD patients following OGS have an impact on TMJ, masticatory musculature, and surrounding soft tissues, and the changes of TMJ symptoms. Maxillofacial surgeons must remind that any surgical procedures involving mandibular osteotomy can directly affect TMJ symptoms, thus pre-existing TMJ symptoms and diagnoses should be considered prior to treatment planning and OGS.

show abstract

Remodelling pattern of the ramus on submentovertex cephalographs after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy

Cited by 8 publications

References 10 publications

Stability of Pre-Orthodontic Orthognathic Surgery Using Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Versus Conventional Treatment

Stability of Pre-Orthodontic Orthognathic Surgery Using Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Versus Conventional Treatment

Complications associated with orthognathic surgery

Orthognathic surgery and temporomandibular joint symptoms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About