2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10311-013-0427-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of hazardous heavy metals from aqueous environment by low-cost adsorption materials

Abstract: The rapid growth of the human population and industrialization in the world has indirectly increased environmental problems such as water, air and land pollution. Amongst all, heavy metals can be considered as the most problematic pollutants. Numerous efforts have been attempted to minimize the impact of heavy metals. This chapter discusses the recent developments and technical applicability of different treatment methods for heavy metal removal. The adsorption process using various lowcost materials as the po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a long time, adsorption has been considered an effective method for pollution control (Reddad et al 2002;Bradl 2004). Adsorption techniques have significant advantages, such as profitability, availability, low cost (for example, the price of adsorption by vermiculite is only 20% of osmotic membrane technology), high efficiency (for example, the adsorption efficiency of kyanite for Cu(II) can reach 100%), and ease of operation in comparison with other techniques (Ajmal et al 2001;Keng et al 2014). Moreover, it offers simple operation and high efficiency (the maximum efficiency can reach 100%) in the removal of toxic heavy metals, even at trace levels (Musyoka et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a long time, adsorption has been considered an effective method for pollution control (Reddad et al 2002;Bradl 2004). Adsorption techniques have significant advantages, such as profitability, availability, low cost (for example, the price of adsorption by vermiculite is only 20% of osmotic membrane technology), high efficiency (for example, the adsorption efficiency of kyanite for Cu(II) can reach 100%), and ease of operation in comparison with other techniques (Ajmal et al 2001;Keng et al 2014). Moreover, it offers simple operation and high efficiency (the maximum efficiency can reach 100%) in the removal of toxic heavy metals, even at trace levels (Musyoka et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various conventional physiochemical processes are used for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater such as coagulation, flocculation [20], precipitation [21], adsorption [22], membrane filtration [23], electrolysis [24], photocatalytic degradation [25], ion exchange [26], oxidation, reduction [27] and solvent extraction [28]. Different researchers have indicated the strength and limitation of these techniques [1,[29][30][31]. Among these, adsorption method does not require a huge input of chemical reagents that create other environmental and health problems to deal with secondary pollutants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ingestion of copper, zinc, cadmium, lead, mercury, iron and nickel in amounts exceeding guidelines damages severely human physiology [3]. Several treatment techniques for heavy metals removal from wastewater have been reported in literature [4]. Chemical precipitation, ion exchange and adsorption are among these methods are.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%