2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-009-0176-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of iron from drinking water by electrocoagulation: Adsorption and kinetics studies

Abstract: The present study provides an electrocoagulation process for the removal of iron from drinking water with aluminum alloy as the anode and stainless steel as the cathode. The studies were carried out as a function of pH, temperature and current density. The adsorption capacity was evaluated with both the Langmuir and the Freundlich isotherm models. The results showed that the maximum removal efficiency of 98.8% was achieved at a current density of 0.06 A dm −2 , at a pH of 6.5. The adsorption of iron preferably… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…K f value of 11.7841 and 1/n value of 0.3957 were obtained from the plot. Value of 1/n between 0 and 1 is the indication of good sorption [65][66][67][68]. In the present study, a value of 0.3957 was obtained and it indicates that the sorption of MG dye onto the AgNPs was favourable.…”
Section: Freundlich Isothermsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…K f value of 11.7841 and 1/n value of 0.3957 were obtained from the plot. Value of 1/n between 0 and 1 is the indication of good sorption [65][66][67][68]. In the present study, a value of 0.3957 was obtained and it indicates that the sorption of MG dye onto the AgNPs was favourable.…”
Section: Freundlich Isothermsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…These include, electrode material (Bagga et al, 2008;Gomes et al, 2007;Chou et al, 2009) inter-electrode spacing (Dalvand et al, 2011), current density (Arslan-Alaton et al, 2008), initial concentration/dose (Mouedhen et al, 2008;Mkpenie et al, 2014), initial pH (Sasson et al, 2009;Irdemez et al, 2006), supporting electrolyte (Trompette and Vergnes, 2009), electrolysis/treatment time (Giwa et al, 2012;Avsar et al, 2012) and temperature (Katal and Pahlavanzadeh, 2011;Vasudevan et al, 2009a;Yilmaz et al, 2008a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has demonstrated that electrocoagulation offers an attractive alternative method for treating water [18]. EC treatment is characterized by simple and easy operated equipment, short operation time, no addition of chemicals and low sludge production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%