2010
DOI: 10.1366/000370210790619528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removing Cosmic Ray Features from Raman Map Data by a Refined Nearest Neighbor Comparison Method as a Precursor for Chemometric Analysis

Abstract: An algorithm to remove cosmic ray (CR) features from Raman spectra collected in mapping experiments using a charge-coupled device (CCD) is presented. Each spectrum is compared to spectra collected from adjacent points in space using correlation values. The most similar neighbor (MSN) spectrum is selected, offset, and used for identification of CRs. The offset values are defined in terms of the noise level for data with a low signal-to-noise ratio and in terms of the peak height for data with a high signal-to-n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this approach is not suitable for Raman imaging when a large number of spectra are recorded. Thus, specialized spike correction approaches like wavelet transform (Ehrentreich and Summchen, 2001 ), correlation methods (Cappel et al, 2010 ), calculation of the Laplacian of the spectral data matrix (Schulze and Turner, 2014 ; Ryabchykov et al, 2016 ), or a difference between the original and a smoothed spectrum (Zhang and Henson, 2007 ) must be used for spike removal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this approach is not suitable for Raman imaging when a large number of spectra are recorded. Thus, specialized spike correction approaches like wavelet transform (Ehrentreich and Summchen, 2001 ), correlation methods (Cappel et al, 2010 ), calculation of the Laplacian of the spectral data matrix (Schulze and Turner, 2014 ; Ryabchykov et al, 2016 ), or a difference between the original and a smoothed spectrum (Zhang and Henson, 2007 ) must be used for spike removal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Method \Nearest Neighbor Comparison (NNC)" is therefore raised to detect spikes and recover spectral signal. 25 Based on the statistical assumption that neighboring pixels share similar intensity values, NNC determines an o®set value to identify spikes and replace them with scaled value of the most similar neighbors. Most commercial software are also able to achieve spikes corrections and in a real-time manner.…”
Section: Spectral Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This metric has previously been applied to compare the similarity between Raman spectra for cosmic ray removal. 31 The corresponding values obtained using this method are available in Table 2, where 1.000 is the optimum result, and lower values represent less covariance between spectra.…”
Section: 30mentioning
confidence: 99%