2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeat 2-Stage Revision for Recurrent Infection of Total Hip Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these extensive surgeries for treatment of infected revision THA will be difficult and risky to perform in patients with comorbidities and prior revision THAs. Furthermore, the likelihood of complications is higher in infected revision THA than in infected primary THA along with more extensive loss of muscular mass, bone, or both162325). Accordingly, the treatment of infected revision THA is challenging and the decision about which option to perform is very difficult for arthroplasty surgeons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these extensive surgeries for treatment of infected revision THA will be difficult and risky to perform in patients with comorbidities and prior revision THAs. Furthermore, the likelihood of complications is higher in infected revision THA than in infected primary THA along with more extensive loss of muscular mass, bone, or both162325). Accordingly, the treatment of infected revision THA is challenging and the decision about which option to perform is very difficult for arthroplasty surgeons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative, less extensive surgeries such as debridement and component retention, minor partial one-stage exchange, and major partial one-stage exchange have been performed in a select group of cases, and success rates ranging from 38% to 90% have been reported to date91220212223). We performed aggressive debridement and used antibiotic-loaded cement beads with retention of the prosthesis for treating acute delayed or late infection of revision THAs, and did even in cases of reinfection after two-stage reimplantation for infected primary or revision THAs because a low success rate of 36.4% has been reported after another reimplantation, to date25). Our preliminary study shows a favorable result compared with other less extensive surgeries despite a lower success rate than with one- or two-stage reimplantation1920212223).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the incidence of PJI ranges from 0.2% to 1%34567), the PJI is a significant (or major) cause of implant failure and requires multiple operations including revision arthroplasty89). Moreover, the treatment of PJI is very difficult and recurrence is common1011). Therefore, the prevention of PJI is very important in hip arthroplasty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their series, the infecting microorganisms were polymicrobial in 3 patients and only 2 had reinfection by the initial offending microbe (22).…”
Section: Evidence Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Justification: Patients undergoing reimplantation surgery following a two-stage exchange procedure are at risk of developing recurrent infection (21,22). The recurrent infection may be either due to incomplete eradication of the prior bacteria during the antibiotic spacer exchange or to a new infection.…”
Section: Evidence Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%