2014
DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.149158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeat gas insufflation for successful closure of idiopathic macular hole following failed primary surgery-our experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MH revealed complete closure at the two-week follow-up after re-surgery. Singh et al [9] also performed simple uid-air exchange with 14% C 3 F 8 gas injection in 3 patients with IMH who failed the primary PPV operation and found that the holes were closed and that visual acuity improved in 6 weeks after surgery. 4 patients in the above studies had the characteristic "cuff" sign.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MH revealed complete closure at the two-week follow-up after re-surgery. Singh et al [9] also performed simple uid-air exchange with 14% C 3 F 8 gas injection in 3 patients with IMH who failed the primary PPV operation and found that the holes were closed and that visual acuity improved in 6 weeks after surgery. 4 patients in the above studies had the characteristic "cuff" sign.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RPE pumps then drive the fluid out of the swollen macula. [ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ] Comparison of other studies evaluating the treatment of persistent macular holes by FGE is given in Table 4 . The largest study till date was conducted by Rao et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have shown that “fluid-gas exchange (FGE)” can be used for the treatment of persistent macular holes. [ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ] However, all these studies included mostly small and Stage III macular holes. The number of patients with large macular holes in these studies was minimal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thank the authors for their interest in our article. [ 1 2 ] We welcome their inputs and opinion. We would like to reiterate that these observations apply to “idiopathic” macular holes and that case selection is important.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%