2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeatability of posterior and total corneal curvature measurements with a dual Scheimpflug–Placido tomographer

Abstract: Drs. Koch, Weikert, and Wang received research support from Ziemer USA, Inc. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
40
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The worse values were observed for TCA magnitude, whose CoV was 16.58%, but this is not surprising, as the repeatability of corneal astigmatism magnitude measurements is relatively low with all instruments, even in healthy eyes. Our data are similar to those previously reported by other authors [11][12][13][14][15] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The worse values were observed for TCA magnitude, whose CoV was 16.58%, but this is not surprising, as the repeatability of corneal astigmatism magnitude measurements is relatively low with all instruments, even in healthy eyes. Our data are similar to those previously reported by other authors [11][12][13][14][15] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…They include the mean Sim-K (calculated using the standard keratometric index of 1.3375), posterior corneal curvature, TCP (obtained by ray tracing through the anterior and posterior surfaces and a 3-mm diameter entrance pupil), total corneal astigmatism (TCA, analyzed with and without vector analysis) 21 , anterior and posterior corneal asphericity in the 8.0 mm zone (calculated as the Q-value), corneal diameter, thinnest corneal thickness, epithelial thickness and aqueous depth (AQD, i.e., the axial distance between the corneal endothelium and the anterior surface of the lens). The details of each measured parameter have been previously described 13 . With the exception of epithelial thickness, the corresponding values provided by the Sirius were analyzed to assess agreement.…”
Section: Measured Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cerviño et al [2] reported ICC values of more than 0.950 for anterior and posterior corneal curvature measurements obtained in normal healthy eyes with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug-Placido analyzer from Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG (Switzerland). Kim et al [7] reported for the same dual Scheimpflug-Placido system S w values of 0.08 and 0.09 D for simulated keratometry in normal healthy and postrefractive surgery eyes, respectively. McAlinden et al [12] reported repeatability limits expressed as the within-subject standard deviation × 1.962 of the anterior flattest and steepest keratometry readings of 0.25 and 0.36 D, respectively, using the Pentacam system from Oculus (Wetzlar, Germany) in a sample of normal healthy eyes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Overall, the DRS analyzer provides anterior segment measurements with good repeatability and reproducibility for both normal and postrefractive surgery corneas. 11 There have been numerous studies comparing the clinical outcomes of LASIK and SMILE, but to the best of our knowledge no previous study has compared the anterior segment morphological parameters after FS-LASIK and SMILE using a DRS analyzer. In the present study, we used a DRS analyzer to evaluate changes in the anterior segment following FS-LASIK (Visumax ® & Mel 90 ® ; Carl Zeiss Meditec) and SMILE (Visumax ® ; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) for myopic correction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%