2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeatability of Zone Averages Compared to Single-Point Measurements of Maximal Curvature in Keratoconus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As opposed to the diagnosis of keratoconus, monitoring disease progression has still not made significant improvements, but our understanding of progression has improved markedly. The repeatability of measurements in eyes with keratoconus is still a concern [68][69][70][71], especially in moderate to advanced disease with kmax >50 D [72,73]. Our group has shown that 3 and 4 mm zone averaging of data points centered on Kmax had significantly better repeatability than single point kmax [73].…”
Section: Monitoring Keratoconus Progressionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As opposed to the diagnosis of keratoconus, monitoring disease progression has still not made significant improvements, but our understanding of progression has improved markedly. The repeatability of measurements in eyes with keratoconus is still a concern [68][69][70][71], especially in moderate to advanced disease with kmax >50 D [72,73]. Our group has shown that 3 and 4 mm zone averaging of data points centered on Kmax had significantly better repeatability than single point kmax [73].…”
Section: Monitoring Keratoconus Progressionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The repeatability of measurements in eyes with keratoconus is still a concern [68][69][70][71], especially in moderate to advanced disease with kmax >50 D [72,73]. Our group has shown that 3 and 4 mm zone averaging of data points centered on Kmax had significantly better repeatability than single point kmax [73]. The ABCD keratoconus grading system, initially described on the Pentacam by Belin [74], has also been proposed as a promising means by which to assess disease progression, even after cross-linking [75,76].…”
Section: Monitoring Keratoconus Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the top 10 parameters from that list (see Table S1 ), 6 nonredundant, potentially platform-independent parameters were selected: age, known to affect KC progression [ 11 , 26 ]; the average keratometry in a 3 mm area around the maximum keratometry (KmaxZonalMean3mm) [ 27 ]; the steepest radius (RsF) and best fit sphere over an area of 8 mm (BFSF) of the front surface; and the average radius of the back surface (RmB) and LOGIK [ 18 ], which is based on the elevation maps of both corneal surfaces and the minimum pachymetry. None of the parameters included were based on a single corneal point.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Актуальность. Эндотелиальная микроскопия играет важную роль при измерении плотности эндотелиальных клеток роговицы для клинической диагностики, клинических исследований, а также при оценке эндотелия до и после оперативных вмешательств на роговице [1].…”
Section: For Citationunclassified