2015
DOI: 10.2147/cia.s96526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated vertebral augmentation for new vertebral compression fractures of postvertebral augmentation patients: a nationwide cohort study – how useful is the current clinical gold standard for fracture risk?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As osteoporosis is symptomless, silent and progressive, the need for an accurate fracture prediction model is crucial for effective patient management. Currently, the gold standard for identifying osteoporosis and increased fracture risk is through quantification of bone mineral density (BMD) [3], using dual energy X-ray absorption (DEXA) [4]. However the use of BMD to diagnose osteoporosis is not without limitation, with a study by Wainwright reporting that 54% of new hip fractures occurred in women who did not have osteoporosis according to their BMD [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As osteoporosis is symptomless, silent and progressive, the need for an accurate fracture prediction model is crucial for effective patient management. Currently, the gold standard for identifying osteoporosis and increased fracture risk is through quantification of bone mineral density (BMD) [3], using dual energy X-ray absorption (DEXA) [4]. However the use of BMD to diagnose osteoporosis is not without limitation, with a study by Wainwright reporting that 54% of new hip fractures occurred in women who did not have osteoporosis according to their BMD [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%