2010
DOI: 10.1027/0027-5910/a000052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repetition of Suicide Attempts

Abstract: This study from five low- and middle-income countries does not confirm the effectiveness of brief educational intervention and follow-up contacts for suicide attempters in reducing subsequent repetition of suicide attempts up to 18 months after discharge from emergency departments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…18 were either cross sectional descriptive studies or retrospective studies based on medical case records (Table 1). One study included an intervention (brief intervention and contact following attempted self-harm) and was a randomized controlled trial [16]. In all except two studies, participants were inpatients admitted to hospital for medical treatment of acute self-poisoning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 were either cross sectional descriptive studies or retrospective studies based on medical case records (Table 1). One study included an intervention (brief intervention and contact following attempted self-harm) and was a randomized controlled trial [16]. In all except two studies, participants were inpatients admitted to hospital for medical treatment of acute self-poisoning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct comparisons with non-western or developing countries is limited by the lack of studies (Owens et al, 2002), however one intervention trial conducted in five nonwestern countries in hospital treated suicide attempt populations reported 18 month follow-up data, which helps to contextualise the results of the current study (Bertolote et al, 2010). The proportions with any repeated suicide attempt for intervention v control were: Campinas, Brazil (30% v 16%), Chennai, India (3% v 7%), Colombo, Sri Lanka (2% v 4%), Yuncheng, China (2% v 0%) and Karaj, Iran (11% v 9%); with no overall difference in repeated suicide attempt (7.6% v 7.5%).…”
Section: Dsp and Other Suicidal Behaviours In A Non-western Countrymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…larger than other studies using randomisation of the individual or cluster randomisation of general practices (Bertolote et al, 2010;Bennewith et al, 2002). The retention rate of 87% after 24 months was high and there was nearly equal loss to follow-up in either group (13.3% intervention v 12.7% control).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data on rates of repetition of self-harm in Sri Lanka is limited; two studies in this review prospectively examined the rates of repetition following non-fatal self-poisoning, and reported repetition rates of 4% and 2.7% at 18 month and 12 month follow-up, respectively (16,17).…”
Section: Repetition Risk After Self-harmmentioning
confidence: 99%