2003
DOI: 10.3758/bf03196122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repetition priming mediated by task similarity in semantic classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The competitive/ noncompetitive access theory distinguishes between conceptual tasks that arouse multiple response candidates and conceptual tasks that elicit a unique response. While these accounts are reasonable descriptions of the results reported by these authors, they fail to account for other patterns of data, as presented in our recent reports of repetition priming, that seem to reflect different aspects of conceptual similarity (Franks, Bilbrey, Lien, & McNamara, 2000;Xiong, Franks, & Logan, 2003). In particular, Xiong et al presented a case for the importance of semantic differential representations of conceptual similarity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 49%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The competitive/ noncompetitive access theory distinguishes between conceptual tasks that arouse multiple response candidates and conceptual tasks that elicit a unique response. While these accounts are reasonable descriptions of the results reported by these authors, they fail to account for other patterns of data, as presented in our recent reports of repetition priming, that seem to reflect different aspects of conceptual similarity (Franks, Bilbrey, Lien, & McNamara, 2000;Xiong, Franks, & Logan, 2003). In particular, Xiong et al presented a case for the importance of semantic differential representations of conceptual similarity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 49%
“…IAT effects should reveal whether the ends of these semantic scales are aligned or misaligned. Repetition priming experiments (Xiong et al, 2003) have not tested this aspect of the semantic differential framework.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…: Lozito & Mulligan, 2010) ou a diferença no TR para itens estudados (old) e não estudados (new), isto é, M TRnew -M TRold = M TRpriming (ex. : Xiong, Franks, & Logan, 2003). Em decisão lexical, a medida mais utilizada têm sido a média do TR para itens corretos (ex.…”
Section: Associação De Palavrasunclassified