2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replication stress impairs chromosome segregation and preimplantation development in human embryos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
67
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
9
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of 53BP1 NBs (>1 μm in diameter) in G1-phase cells (cyclin A negative) showed a significant increase in NB formation in RAS-expressing cells compared with control cells ( Figures 1 G and 1H). In contrast to large 53BP1 NBs, small 53BP1 foci were reported to form at double-strand breaks (DBSs) irrespectively of replication stress ( Palmerola et al., 2022 ; Schultz et al., 2000 ). Interestingly, analysis of small 53BP1 foci (<1 μm in diameter) in G1 cells showed an increase in foci formation in RAS-expressing cells ( Figures S2 A and S2B), suggesting that RAS induced both replicative and non-replicative DNA damage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis of 53BP1 NBs (>1 μm in diameter) in G1-phase cells (cyclin A negative) showed a significant increase in NB formation in RAS-expressing cells compared with control cells ( Figures 1 G and 1H). In contrast to large 53BP1 NBs, small 53BP1 foci were reported to form at double-strand breaks (DBSs) irrespectively of replication stress ( Palmerola et al., 2022 ; Schultz et al., 2000 ). Interestingly, analysis of small 53BP1 foci (<1 μm in diameter) in G1 cells showed an increase in foci formation in RAS-expressing cells ( Figures S2 A and S2B), suggesting that RAS induced both replicative and non-replicative DNA damage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of our results, TOP1-induced accelerated replication may promote mutagenesis, associated with DNA replication. Interestingly, RAS-expressing cells show an increase in single-stranded DNA (ssDNA; phosphorylated Chk1) and markers of under-replicated regions (fragile sites) ( Figures 1 I, 1J, S2 E, and S2F), raising the possibility that excess TOP1 and accelerated replication may perturb DNA replication and its proofreading and thus leave behind ssDNA lesions that may be converted to DSBs ( Palmerola et al., 2022 ). Further studies are required to shed light on the molecular mechanism(s) underlying accelerated replication-induced DNA damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is similar to findings in a non-human primate model showing that abnormal chromosomes can be encapsulated in micronuclei, which can subsequently be selectively eliminated from the embryo 34 . In human cleavage stage embryos these micronuclei have been shown to contain genetic material that originates from chromosome breakages due to replication fork stalling and DNA-damage during the first cell-cycle 35 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reports are consistent with a higher degree of chaotic aneuploidy observed in poorer quality and slower growing blastocysts (Figures 5A,B; Figures S5A,B; Figures S6A,B). Interestingly, recent work by Palmerola et al (2022) confirmed a high level of incomplete DNA replication resulting in chromosome breaks and mitotic aneuploidy in human zygotes, referred to as replication stress. It is tempting to conclude that our findings are consistent with those of Palmerola et al, (2022) with the caveat that their studies involved the use of donated vitrified MII oocytes (see also Cavazza and Schuh, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%