2017
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.190496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply: Comparison of Empiric Versus Dosimetry-Guided Radioiodine Therapy: The Devil Is in the Details

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This comment points out, as discussed in our reply to letters by Tulchinsky and Flux, the critical importance of lesional dosimetry in patients with large tumor burden to define the optimal administered activity to achieve a therapeutic tumoricidal dose, rather than the maximum activity that can be safely delivered (5). WB/BC studies would be required only if the administered activity exceeded safe empiric activities to optimize the therapeutic efficacy while minimizing treatment-related side effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This comment points out, as discussed in our reply to letters by Tulchinsky and Flux, the critical importance of lesional dosimetry in patients with large tumor burden to define the optimal administered activity to achieve a therapeutic tumoricidal dose, rather than the maximum activity that can be safely delivered (5). WB/BC studies would be required only if the administered activity exceeded safe empiric activities to optimize the therapeutic efficacy while minimizing treatment-related side effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%