2010
DOI: 10.1029/2009wr009028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to comment by Jack Lewis et al. on “Forests and floods: A new paradigm sheds light on age‐old controversies”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Caissie et al 2002;Hornbeck et al 1993;Lavigne et al 2004;Robinson et al 2003). However, Alila et al (2009Alila et al ( , 2010 recently questioned the appropriateness of the methods used in these studies. Furthermore, these methods do not allow quantification of the effect of forest cover on the spatial variability of flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Caissie et al 2002;Hornbeck et al 1993;Lavigne et al 2004;Robinson et al 2003). However, Alila et al (2009Alila et al ( , 2010 recently questioned the appropriateness of the methods used in these studies. Furthermore, these methods do not allow quantification of the effect of forest cover on the spatial variability of flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…attributing a return period of 7 years to a flood peak of 20 years. This figure shows that relatively small changes in the estimated flood peak magnitude can translate into surprisingly large changes in their return periods, as a consequence of the strong non-linearity of the flood frequency curve (Alila et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This does not necessarily mean that the effect of forest cover on flood peaks is not relevant for higher return periods. In fact, owing to the correlation between the forest cover fraction and the other hydromorphological parameters employed in the examined flood regionalization procedure, the forest cover can also indirectly influence the ratio of the corresponding index values and thus the position of the entire flood frequency distribution (Alila et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this explanation does not apply to the present study, since the catchments were exploited as pastures or agricultural fields for a sustained period of time prior to their abandonment and subsequent forest regeneration. Another possible reason for the inconclusive results obtained by many studies is the use of seasonal or annual mean Q characteristics only, whereas it is generally preferred to use characteristics related to the frequency and magnitude of Q (Alila et al, 2009(Alila et al, , 2010, particularly when evaluating the change in peak flows. Finally, the failure to correct for climatic variability by many studies may also have led to inconclusive or even erroneous outcomes.…”
Section: Potential Explanations For the Lack Of Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%