1986
DOI: 10.1029/wr022i006p00991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply [to “Comment on ‘Hillside Seepage: An Analytical Solution to a Nonlinear Dupuit‐Forchheimer Problem’ by S. R. Yates et al.”]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have generally confirmed the results of the previous study [15] and, in only a few cases, have they been modified. In addition, we have placed 44 new levels and γ rays deexciting 26 levels seen in in-beam fusion evaporation reactions for the first time [17].…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We have generally confirmed the results of the previous study [15] and, in only a few cases, have they been modified. In addition, we have placed 44 new levels and γ rays deexciting 26 levels seen in in-beam fusion evaporation reactions for the first time [17].…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…+ levels at 3457 and 3485 keV characterized by Yates et al [15] were also observed in the current work, and important new information for both states has emerged. The new data firmly place a Doppler-broadened 1877-keV γ ray as the transition from the 3457-keV state to the 3 − level and exclude the previous 6 + assignment for that state.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations