2019
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.rl119.007419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to Koh: Signaling dynamics of DNA damage response invoked by combination therapy are dose-dependent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second wave comes from infiltrating granulocytes and monocytes that elevate proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine production. Except for inflammatory cytokine secretion and oxidative stress induction, neutrophils release their DNA, histone proteins, high mobility group box 1, and granule components into the pancreas to form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which facilitate inflammation by duct occlusion and trypsin activation [ 14 , 19 ]. In parallel, NF- κ B and STAT3 pathways become activated in monocytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second wave comes from infiltrating granulocytes and monocytes that elevate proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine production. Except for inflammatory cytokine secretion and oxidative stress induction, neutrophils release their DNA, histone proteins, high mobility group box 1, and granule components into the pancreas to form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which facilitate inflammation by duct occlusion and trypsin activation [ 14 , 19 ]. In parallel, NF- κ B and STAT3 pathways become activated in monocytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mice with Induced Acute Pancreatitis. As previously described [5,14,15], the pancreatitis damage was assessed in the aspects of inflammation as evidenced by infiltrated inflammatory cells, acinar cell vacuolization and necrosis, and edema in the pancreas. The overall total severity score was 14.7 for no injection, 16.6 for wt BMC injection, and 22.6 for db/db BMC injection (p = 0:001 for db/db BMC injection vs. no injection; p = 0:002 for db/db BMC vs. wt BMC) (Figure 3(a)).…”
Section: The Effect Of Bmc Injection On Histological Changes Inmentioning
confidence: 99%