Reporting Institutional Review Board Approval and Patient Consent

Olson, Carin M; Jobe, Kathleen A.

doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550060053031

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ten cadaver heads (Innoved Institute, Inc, Bensenville, Illinois, USA) were used according to the Helsinki guidelines. 8 Bilateral rinses of the sinonasal cavity were performed using a “labeling solution” that contained a final concentration of 0.1% methylene blue hydrate endoscopically visible tracer (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, USA) and 8.6% iothalamate meglumine radio-opaque contrast agent (Mallinkrodt Inc., St Louis, Missouri, USA) combined in 0.9% premixed saline (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA). Labeling solution (240 mL volume) was irrigated through each nostril of the cadaver using a NeilMed sinus rinse bottle (NeilMed Pharmaceuticals, Santa Rosa, California, USA), with each head inclined forward 20° to mimic standard patient positioning when performing nasal irrigations.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhanced Irrigant Delivery to the Ethmoid Sinuses Directly Following Ethmoid Punch Sinusotomy

Abuzeid

Peterson

Rathor

et al. 2017

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhanced Irrigant Delivery to the Ethmoid Sinuses Directly Following Ethmoid Punch Sinusotomy

Abuzeid

Peterson

Rathor

et al. 2017

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To gain insight into changes of scholarly journals’ recommendations, we conducted a systematic review of studies that analysed journals’ Instructions to Authors (ItAs). We summarised results of 153 studies, and meta-analysed how often ItAs addressed: 1) authorship, 2) conflicts of interest, 3) data sharing, 4) ethics approval, 5) funding disclosure, and 6) International Committee of Medical Journal Editors’ Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts. For each topic we found large between-study heterogeneity. Here, we show six factors that explained most of that heterogeneity: 1) time (addressing of topics generally increased over time), 2) country (large differences found between countries), 3) database indexation (large differences found between databases), 4) impact factor (topics were more often addressed in highest than in lowest impact factor journals), 5) discipline (topics were more often addressed in Health Sciences than in other disciplines), and 6) sub-discipline (topics were more often addressed in general than in sub-disciplinary journals).

show abstract

Reporting Institutional Review Board Approval and Patient Consent

Cited by 2 publications

References 3 publications

Enhanced Irrigant Delivery to the Ethmoid Sinuses Directly Following Ethmoid Punch Sinusotomy

Enhanced Irrigant Delivery to the Ethmoid Sinuses Directly Following Ethmoid Punch Sinusotomy

Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About