2021
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1955692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representative Sampling of the Via Assessment Suite for Adults

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A third limitation concerns the VIA-IS-P (McGrath, 2019), which is a self-administered questionnaire. Even if all previous studies have relied on self-reports (Wagner et al, 2020), our results are susceptible to common method bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A third limitation concerns the VIA-IS-P (McGrath, 2019), which is a self-administered questionnaire. Even if all previous studies have relied on self-reports (Wagner et al, 2020), our results are susceptible to common method bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second questionnaire assessed the 24 character strengths (grouped under six virtues; see Table 1) using the French translation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths – Positively keyed (VIA-IS-P; McGrath, 2019). This short version contains 96 items rated on a Likert scale from 1 ( Very much unlike me ) to 5 ( Very much like me ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of the VIA trait space has so far mainly focused on the 24 character strengths (Bluemke et al, 2021;McGrath et al, 2021), which have a similar level of abstraction as personality facets. By contrast, because of the longstanding lack of consensus regarding the number and nature of meaningful higher-order dimensions in the VIA framework, measures of factor-analytically determined global VIA traits have long been in short supply.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various factor-analytic approaches to aggregate the 24 character strengths were of varying methodological quality and yielded inconsistent results that ranged from anywhere between 1 and 6 global dimensions (for a detailed review see Partsch et al, 2021). However, several more recent studies clearly pointed to three global dimensions (especially McGrath, 2015;McGrath et al, 2018McGrath et al, , 2021McGrath & Wallace, 2019). McGrath and colleagues interpreted the three factors they identified as Caring (supposed to capture interpersonal strengths/interpersonal concern), Inquisitiveness (intellectual strengths/information seeking), and Self-Control (intrapersonal strengths/intrapersonal regulation) and referred to them as "three-virtue model".…”
Section: Three Core Strengths In the Factor-analytic Trait Hierarchymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 24 strengths, an individual will have signature, middle and lesser strengths. Signature strengths are the five strongest strengths and are considered central to identity (McGrath, 2019). They are the strengths that are most naturally practised and have the greatest potential in their everyday value (Niemiec, 2017; Peterson and Seligman, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%