2008 16th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/re.2008.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Requirements Prioritization Based on Benefit and Cost Prediction: An Agenda for Future Research

Abstract: In early phases of the software cycle, requirements prioritization necessarily relies on the specified requirements and on predictions of benefit and cost of individual requirements. This paper presents results of a systematic review of literature, which investigates how existing methods approach the problem of requirements prioritization based on benefit and cost. From this review, it derives a set of under-researched issues which warrant future efforts and sketches an agenda for future research in this area.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…E.g. Stakeholder S 1 observing quality somewhere between "Important" and "Highly important" assigns the triangular fuzzy number (6,7,8) to it and due to being equally concerned for the profit of industry, keeps the profit among somewhere "Important" and "Highly…”
Section: Stakeholder S 1 'S Decision Making Regarding the Priorities/mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…E.g. Stakeholder S 1 observing quality somewhere between "Important" and "Highly important" assigns the triangular fuzzy number (6,7,8) to it and due to being equally concerned for the profit of industry, keeps the profit among somewhere "Important" and "Highly…”
Section: Stakeholder S 1 'S Decision Making Regarding the Priorities/mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal priority of cost against intersection of weight factors pertaining to profit and quality important" category, therefore assigns the triangular fuzzy number (6,7,8) to it as shown in TABLE III. From the fuzzy weights obtained by stakeholders as taken in TABLE III nothing concrete can be interpreted, as overlapping of the membership functions allows a weight to belong to more than one set at the same time.…”
Section: Shaded Area Work As the Fuzzy Set Representing Final Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations