2017
DOI: 10.4238/gmr16039795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Article Genotype x environment interaction and stability of soybean cultivars for vegetative-stage characters.

Abstract: In order to obtain the certificate of cultivar protection, it is necessary to prove its distinctiveness, homogeneity, and stability. Currently, there are 37 descriptors for differentiating soybeans cultivars. However, they are still not enough and, as a result, it is necessary to create, identify, and evaluate new descriptors. This study was aimed at evaluating the genotypic and environment interaction (GxE) and determining the stability of eight soybean cultivars for five vegetative-stage descriptors. The res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
11
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitudes of the coefficients of variation obtained in Experiment 1 and 2 were 7.96% and 7.35%, respectively, and they corroborate with those obtained by Nogueira et al (2008), Matsuo, Sediyama, Cruz, Oliveira andCadore (2012a) and lower than those obtained by Silva et al (2016), Chaves et al (2017), Camargos et al (2019 and Hanyu et al (2020).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The magnitudes of the coefficients of variation obtained in Experiment 1 and 2 were 7.96% and 7.35%, respectively, and they corroborate with those obtained by Nogueira et al (2008), Matsuo, Sediyama, Cruz, Oliveira andCadore (2012a) and lower than those obtained by Silva et al (2016), Chaves et al (2017), Camargos et al (2019 and Hanyu et al (2020).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Concerning the fact of having identified significant difference between cultivars regarding the epicotyl length of soybean seedlings evaluated at the V2 development stage, the present work corroborates with those of Matsuo et al (2012a), Matsuo, Sediyama, Cruz andOliveira (2012b), Silva et al (2016), Chaves et al (2017), Alves et al (2019), Camargos et al (2019 and Hanyu et al (2020). The observed significance indicates that the soybean genotypes show differences among themselves, which enables successful selection of promising materials (Matsuo et al, 2012b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Estimates for genotypic determination coefficient (H 2 (%)) were superior to 74%, 78% e and 79% for hypocotyl and epicotyl length and plant height, respectively, regardless of the evaluation period. Estimates above 70% indicate high genetic influence on the phenotypic expression (Chaves et al, 2017). Thus, results from the present work show great genetic influence for characters in the two evaluation periods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…This shows the presence of genetic variance between the genotypes studied. This is a necessary condition for a character to become useful to character differentiation (Chaves et al, 2017;Nogueira et al, 2008;Silva et al, 2016). Estimates for genotypic determination coefficient (H 2 (%)) were superior to 74%, 78% e and 79% for hypocotyl and epicotyl length and plant height, respectively, regardless of the evaluation period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barley and Egyptian clover raised as sole crops produced significantly higher biological and grain yields compared to barley-Egyptian clover intercropping treatments during both years. The final yield of a crop is a collective effect of agronomic, genetic and environmental conditions [35]. Barley and Egyptian clover yields were reduced by intercropping and planting geometries established with different planting intensities [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%