Research hotspots and emerging trends of automated peritoneal dialysis: A bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2020

Tong, Yan; Wang, Hong; Cao, Xueying; Cai, Guangyan; Chen, Xiangmei; Zhou, Jianhui

doi:10.1111/sdi.13078

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 61 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…APD has become the prevalent mode of peritoneal dialysis in most high-income countries. 12 , 13 Previously studies showed that factors such as educational background, occupation, dialysis duration, knowledge of APD, and family support may affect that influence patients’ choosing APD. 5 In this study, we performed a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study to investigate the factors that affect the patients’ choice for APD treatment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Influencing the Choice of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Treatment by Patients Receiving Home Peritoneal Dialysis

Cao,

Hong,

Ruan

et al. 2023

PPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective This study was conducted to understand the influencing factors for home peritoneal dialysis patients choosing APD and to provide a scientific basis for improving the completion rate of APD treatment and the follow-up of peritoneal dialysis patients. Methods The study was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. A total of 588 patients on peritoneal dialysis were randomly selected from 6 regions in Fujian Province in southern China using a stratified cluster sampling method. Results The mean age of the patients were 56.5 ± 14.73 years. In the univariate analysis, knowledge, user experience and family support were the factors that affected patients’ choice of APD (all P < 0.05) and were positively correlated with the treatment utilization rate. In the multivariate analysis, 3 factors (treatment with APD, knowledge of APD, and family support) remained significantly associated not choosing APD. The selection rate for APD was 2.594 times higher among patients who had received APD than among patients who had never received APD. The selection rate for patients with “a lot of knowledge” about APD was 10.75 times that of patients with “no knowledge”. Conclusion Patients’ knowledge of APD, experience in application and family support were the main factors affecting the choice of APD as a treatment mode ( P < 0.05) and were positively correlated with the treatment utilization rate. Further studies are needed to improve the APD treatment completion rates by modulation the above-mentioned factors. Relevance to Clinical Practice This study provides scientific evidence for improving APD treatment completion rates and improving patient quality of life.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Influencing the Choice of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Treatment by Patients Receiving Home Peritoneal Dialysis

Cao,

Hong,

Ruan

et al. 2023

PPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Analyzing the most highly cited articles in a field provides insights into key areas and research trends. While bibliometric analyses have been conducted in nephrology on topics such as hemodialysis, automatic peritoneal dialysis, diabetic nephropathy, renal fibrosis, and the relationship between lifestyle changes and CKD, [7][8][9][10] to date, no bibliometric analysis specifically focusing on CKD-MBD articles has been performed. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the top-cited articles on CKD-MBD, providing valuable insights and establishing a foundation for future research.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The 100 top-cited articles on chronic kidney disease–mineral and bone disorder: A bibliometric analysis

Kang,

Mao,

Zhang

et al. 2024

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Tremendous scientific research has been conducted on chronic kidney disease–mineral and bone disorder (CKD–MBD), while only a few bibliometric analyses have been conducted in this field. In this study, we aim to identify 100 top-cited articles on CKD–MBD and analyze their main characteristics quantitatively. Methods: Web of Science was used to search the 100 top-cited articles on CKD–MBD. The following data were extracted and analyzed from the selected articles: author, country of origin, institutions, article type, publication journal, publication year, citation frequency, and keywords. Results: Among the 100 top-cited articles, the number of citations ranged between 181 to 2157, with an average number of citations of approximately 476. These articles were published in 23 different journals, with Kidney International publishing the most articles (n = 32). The largest contributor was the United States (n = 63), which was also the country that conducted the most collaborative studies with other nations. The University of Washington contributed the largest number of articles (n = 37). Block GA was the most common first-author (n = 7). The majority of articles were clinical research articles (n = 73), followed by reviews (n = 15). Although almost half of the articles had no keywords, the most concerned research direction was CKD-associated bone disease. Conclusion: This is the first bibliometric study of the 100 top-cited articles on CKD–MBD. This study provides the main academic interests and research trends associated with CKD–MBD research.

show abstract

“…The utilization of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) which was originally reserved for patients with high transport status has increased over recent years, paralleled by a substantial growth of accumulating studies on APD [1]. Due to its lifestyle benefits, wider range of prescription options, and the availability of convenient automated machines, APD has become a desirable peritoneal dialysis (PD) modality for individuals with other transport characteristics.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

In-center Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: Clinical Features, Practice Patterns, and Patient Survival From a 6-year Cohort Study in China

Hu,

Ren,

Yang

et al. 2023

Kidney Blood Press Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: In-center automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) has been more frequently adopted in clinical practice for maintenance PD patients in China. For a better understanding of its clinical uptake, this retrospective study reviewed incident PD patients for a period of 6 years, investigating the practice pattern of in-center APD, factors associated with the use of in-center APD, and report on the patient survival compared to the non-users of APD among hospitalised PD patients. Methods: This was a cohort study of all incident PD patients who met the inclusion criteria from 2013/01/01 to 2018/09/30, and were followed until death, cessation of PD, loss to follow-up, or 2018/12/31. Clinical characteristics, patient outcomes, and detailed data on APD sessions were recorded. We used time-dependent Cox model to estimate the variables associated with the initiation of in-center APD, and marginal structural model through inverse probability weighting to adjust for time-varying APD use on the causal pathway to all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 651 subjects over 17501 patient-months were enrolled. Of these, 633 (97.2%) PD patients were hospitalised at least once during follow-up, and 369 (56.7%) received in-center APD at a certain point, and the timing of APD use during the first 3 months, first year and first 2 years since PD inception were 14.8%, 45.4% and 74.8%, respectively. A total of 12553 in-center APD sessions were recorded, where 85.9% used 4 bags of 5L-exchanges per prescription. Time-dependent Cox model showed that diabetes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09−1.76), urine output (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.92), serum albumin (HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.72-0.99), hemoglobin (HR 0.88, 95%CI 0.77-0.99), and Ca×P (HR 1.19, 95%CI 1.06-1.35) were significantly associated with in-center APD use. Among all hospitalised PD patients, the estimated hazard ratio corresponding to the marginal causal effect of in-center APD use on all-cause mortality is 0.13 (95% CI 0.05–0.31, P<0.001). Significant survival benefit (adjusted-HR 0.56, 95%CI 0.33-0.95) associated with starting APD after the first PD year was observed among in-center APD users. Conclusions: In-center APD is used intensively during the first 2 years of PD and is associated with certain clinical features. Over all a significant survival benefit of in-center APD use was observed.

show abstract

Research hotspots and emerging trends of automated peritoneal dialysis: A bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2020

Cited by 3 publications

References 61 publications

Factors Influencing the Choice of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Treatment by Patients Receiving Home Peritoneal Dialysis

Factors Influencing the Choice of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Treatment by Patients Receiving Home Peritoneal Dialysis

The 100 top-cited articles on chronic kidney disease–mineral and bone disorder: A bibliometric analysis

In-center Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: Clinical Features, Practice Patterns, and Patient Survival From a 6-year Cohort Study in China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About