Research in Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak (Rhinorrhea and Otorrhea): A Bibliometric Analysis From 1945 to 2018

Ramos-Rincón, José-Manuel; Monjas‐Cánovas, Irene; Abarca-Olivas, Javier; Gras-Albert, Juan-Ramón; Bellinchón-Romero, Isabel; González‐Alcaide, Gregorio

doi:10.7759/cureus.21888

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Unlike traditional systematic reviews and meta-analyses, bibliometric analysis can reveal both qualitative and quantitative aspects of a research topic from a systematic and intuitive level, exploring its longitudinal and transversal characteristics, developments, and multiple ramifications across various research fields 5 . This analysis has been widely utilised in various medical specialties, including cerebrospinal fluid leak, allergic rhinitis, and chronic rhinosinusitis, to gain a deeper understanding of pathogenesis, identify therapeutic alternatives, improve prognosis and develop guidelines [6][7][8] . However, bibliometric analysis related to SNIP has not been extensively conducted.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global research on sinonasal inverted papilloma over the past two decades: a bibliometric analysis

Fan,

Zhu,

Yang

et al. 2024

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARY Objective This study aimed to investigate the global research status, hot topics, and prospects in the field of sinonasal inverted papilloma (SNIP) through bibliometric analysis. Methods The literature on SNIP was retrieved and downloaded from the Web of Science Core Collection from 2002 to 2021. The bibliometric and visualisation networks of SNIP were constructed using VOSviewer 1.6.18, CiteSpace 6.1. R2, and a bibliometric online analysis platform. Results A total of 560 original articles about SNIP research were included, involving 2,457 authors from 610 institutions in 45 countries. The number of SNIP publications showed an overall rising trend, with an average annual output of 28 articles and almost 3 times as many articles published in 2020 as in 2002. The analysis of keyword burst detection indicated that EGFR mutation, malignant transformation and infection are emerging research hotspots. Moreover, EGFR mutation, KRAS mutation, malignant tumour, metallothionein 2a gene, pre-operative diagnosis, HPV-negative tumour, and expression were among the 11 key clusters of co-cited references. Conclusions This study provided a comprehensive, systematic, and objective analysis and visualised knowledge map of SNIP over the past 2 decades. In particular, current hotspots and prospective trends in the field of SNIP have been identified. These results highlight the future direction of SNIP research for rhinologists.

show abstract