2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-3867-4_60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on Visual Fatigue Related to Parallax

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High disparity can be fused without diplopia, but high disparity induces visual fatigue (Shibata et al, 2011;Patterson, 2015;Fuchs, 2017). Negative parallaxes lead to higher visual fatigue than positive (Sun et al, 2020) Shibata et al (2011 assume that the maximum and minimum relative distance of the comfort zone is between 0.8 and 0.3 D Apply ±1.0 • disparity to avoid visual fatigue (Bando et al, 2012;Matsuura, 2019;Hibbard et al, 2020) However, according to Patterson (Patterson, 2009), fusion is possible from 80 arc minutes for high spatial frequencies and up to 8 • for low spatial frequencies images VF_10 IV…”
Section: Binocular Disparity (Possible and Comfortable Fusion)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High disparity can be fused without diplopia, but high disparity induces visual fatigue (Shibata et al, 2011;Patterson, 2015;Fuchs, 2017). Negative parallaxes lead to higher visual fatigue than positive (Sun et al, 2020) Shibata et al (2011 assume that the maximum and minimum relative distance of the comfort zone is between 0.8 and 0.3 D Apply ±1.0 • disparity to avoid visual fatigue (Bando et al, 2012;Matsuura, 2019;Hibbard et al, 2020) However, according to Patterson (Patterson, 2009), fusion is possible from 80 arc minutes for high spatial frequencies and up to 8 • for low spatial frequencies images VF_10 IV…”
Section: Binocular Disparity (Possible and Comfortable Fusion)mentioning
confidence: 99%