2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2ma00502f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research output software for energetic materials based on observational modelling 2.1 (RoseBoom2.1©)

Abstract: There is huge scope for the implementation of sustainable methods in the research of new energetic materials and there are a number of ways this can be achieved. With the...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, based on the empirical EXPLO5 program, the predicted detonation velocity and detonation pressure for FOX-7 are 8613 m/s and 31.6 GPa, respectively, at an ambient density of 1.845 g/cm 3 . These are much better than the predicted detonation velocity of 8499 m/s and the detonation pressure of 26.7 GPa for FOX-7-T at an unrealistically high density of 1.83 g/cm 3 (the experimental density at ambient conditions 21 is 1.69 g/cm 3 and the calculated density using the Keshavarz equation implemented in the new RoseBoom code 22 is 1.659 g/cm 3 ). Therefore, the detonation performance of FOX-7-T under ambient conditions is expected to be much lower than that of FOX-7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In addition, based on the empirical EXPLO5 program, the predicted detonation velocity and detonation pressure for FOX-7 are 8613 m/s and 31.6 GPa, respectively, at an ambient density of 1.845 g/cm 3 . These are much better than the predicted detonation velocity of 8499 m/s and the detonation pressure of 26.7 GPa for FOX-7-T at an unrealistically high density of 1.83 g/cm 3 (the experimental density at ambient conditions 21 is 1.69 g/cm 3 and the calculated density using the Keshavarz equation implemented in the new RoseBoom code 22 is 1.659 g/cm 3 ). Therefore, the detonation performance of FOX-7-T under ambient conditions is expected to be much lower than that of FOX-7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Since the ∆ f H °(s) value for this acid is not known, the ∆ f H °(g) was calculated for H2C2N10 at CBS-4M (+935 kJ•mol −1 ) or CBS-QB3 (+929 kJ•mol −1 ) levels of theory and converted to the ∆ f H °(s) value by subtraction of the value of ∆ H °. The ∆ H ° value for H2C2N10 used was either approximated as being the same as the value estimated for the similar acid of the TKX-50 dianion (129 kJ•mol −1 ) [7], estimated using the empirical approach reported previously in the literature (98 kJ•mol −1 ) [29], or estimated using the empirical approach implemented in the RoseBoom © program (103.3 kJ•mol −1 ) [30]. Since the base undergoes double protonation in Equation ( 12), the value for ∆ r H has to be included twice in Equation ( 13).…”
Section: Computational Results For Gztmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26][27][28]) were used preferentially over calculated values. For values of • values were not available, they were estimated using either the empirical method reported in the literature [29] or using the RoseBoom2.1 © program [30].…”
Section: Computational Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations