2015 4th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ettlis.2015.7048169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research work and changing dimensions of digital library: A review

Abstract: This is transition time for conventional libraries, especially in India. They are trying hard to transform to digital libraries (DL) but there are various issues involved in it. It is crucial to understand these issues by doing more research to find out appropriate solutions. The purpose of this study is thus to review the existing research done on digital libraries, in order to find the gaps and develop new dimensions to be studied. Secondary data is used from different sources mainly e-journals to conduct me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jochumsen et al (2012) compared the characteristics of the virtual and physical libraries according to the four dimensions of experience, involvement, empowerment, and innovation; Jochumsen et al (2012) compared the physical and virtual libraries, the individual usercentered and the local community-centered, the book and the creation libraries, and the portal and the archive libraries according to the four dimensions. In addition, researchers such as Hendrix (2010), Singh and Sharma (2015), Yoon (1997), Nam (2011), and Noh (2014, 2016 worked to determine the characteristics of a digital library; however, none of studies were performed to comprehensively extract the elements of the conventional and the digital libraries symmetrically as in this study, and none of studies ever developed the index of evaluating the digitization level to actually perform the evaluation. Additionally, the researchers claimed that the libraries having both characteristics must choose one side or the other in considering the effectiveness, rather than that the digital library was more effective than the conventional library.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jochumsen et al (2012) compared the characteristics of the virtual and physical libraries according to the four dimensions of experience, involvement, empowerment, and innovation; Jochumsen et al (2012) compared the physical and virtual libraries, the individual usercentered and the local community-centered, the book and the creation libraries, and the portal and the archive libraries according to the four dimensions. In addition, researchers such as Hendrix (2010), Singh and Sharma (2015), Yoon (1997), Nam (2011), and Noh (2014, 2016 worked to determine the characteristics of a digital library; however, none of studies were performed to comprehensively extract the elements of the conventional and the digital libraries symmetrically as in this study, and none of studies ever developed the index of evaluating the digitization level to actually perform the evaluation. Additionally, the researchers claimed that the libraries having both characteristics must choose one side or the other in considering the effectiveness, rather than that the digital library was more effective than the conventional library.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%