2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-011-3210-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual stresses in aluminium alloy friction stir welds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, Fig. 7 shows the comparison of simulation and experiment results which proved the usability of our optimal thermal cycle cure [17,18].…”
Section: Fem Simulation Of the Surface Welding Processmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Finally, Fig. 7 shows the comparison of simulation and experiment results which proved the usability of our optimal thermal cycle cure [17,18].…”
Section: Fem Simulation Of the Surface Welding Processmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The residual stress profile predicted by the simulation, however, is narrower than the experimental one. At 3.4 mm from the centerline on the advancing side, the residual stress rises to 140 MPa, and on the retreating side, the residual stress rises to 114 MPa at approximately the same distance, developing the M-shape profile characteristic to aluminum alloys ( Ref 22,25). The M-shape does not appear in the experimental residual stress profile, but the distance between experimental measurements is generally too broad to distinctly reveal this feature.…”
Section: Residual Stressmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The plates are joined with an AISI1040 quenched steel tool with a shoulder diameter of 20 mm and a conical pin with a height of 3.8 mm, a diameter of 6.2 mm, and a conical angle of 30°. The tool is running with a tilt angle of 2°, a rotating speed of 1400 rpm, and a traversing speed of 70 mm/min, and hence the process resembles a hot welding condition [9], meaning that the microstructure in the TMAZ will be substantially affected by the FSW process [8].…”
Section: The Fsw Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a more thorough comparison of the different residual stress measurements as well as the applied methods as the one presented here has not been given in literature before. Furthermore, Price et al [3] X-ray diffraction 100 120 Altenkirch et al [4] Neutron and synchroton X-ray diffraction 125 190 Reynolds et al [5] Neutron diffraction 80 90 Steuwer et al [6] synchroton X-ray diffraction 100 175 Dubourg et al [7] Neutron diffraction 150 175 Deplus et al [8] Cut-compliance 50 110 Carlone et al [1] Contour method 50 100…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%