2019 24th Electrical Power Distribution Conference (EPDC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/epdc.2019.8903863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilience Evaluation and Prediction in Electrical Distribution Systems: A Case Study in Golestan Province

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In distribution networks, overhead distribution lines (conductors) and poles can be damaged by hurricanes. The fragility function of conductors and poles is given as follows [30][31][32]:…”
Section: Line Damage Scenarios Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In distribution networks, overhead distribution lines (conductors) and poles can be damaged by hurricanes. The fragility function of conductors and poles is given as follows [30][31][32]:…”
Section: Line Damage Scenarios Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The line damage modelling of the 33-node test network is done under different thresholds and of the distribution line failure probabilities. First, the distribution line failure probabilities are computed based on the maximum wind speed of the category-3 hurricane and the fragility curve of the poles and lines [29,30]. Then, two thresholds of 15% and 20% are presumed, and the distribution lines with failure probabilities higher than these selected thresholds are considered out-ofservice.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the experiences of DSOs in the face of hurricanes, they can select the acceptable thresholds for the line damage scenarios generation. Using the pole fragility function, the failure probability of the distribution line ( i,j ) can be computed as follows [29–31]: ppolefalse(wmfalse)=0.0001e0.0421w plfalse(wmfalse)=1(1ppolefalse(wmfalse))Npole,l…”
Section: Mathematical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation