PsycTESTS Dataset 2014
DOI: 10.1037/t54659-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilient Trait Scale for Chinese Adults--Revised

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, studies on resilience measurement tools were apparent in different age groups such as adolescents [ 14 ], middle school students [ 15 , 16 ], adults [ 17 ], and empty-nest older people [ 18 ]. Similar studies exist in different occupational groups: excellent athletes [ 19 ], medical rescue workers [ 20 ], crisis rescue workers [ 21 ], civil servants [ 22 ], as well as different disease groups: inflammatory bowel disease [ 23 ], malignant tumor [ 24 ], and adolescents with body surface defects [ 25 ]. These scales of resilience which showed a trend of specification in varied kinds of people were not specific to PLHIV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…At present, studies on resilience measurement tools were apparent in different age groups such as adolescents [ 14 ], middle school students [ 15 , 16 ], adults [ 17 ], and empty-nest older people [ 18 ]. Similar studies exist in different occupational groups: excellent athletes [ 19 ], medical rescue workers [ 20 ], crisis rescue workers [ 21 ], civil servants [ 22 ], as well as different disease groups: inflammatory bowel disease [ 23 ], malignant tumor [ 24 ], and adolescents with body surface defects [ 25 ]. These scales of resilience which showed a trend of specification in varied kinds of people were not specific to PLHIV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Evidently, both were greater than 0.30. Then, item-total r was calculated ( Hao and Hong, 2014 ). The total item r refers to the correlation between the item and the total score of the corresponding subscale.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…r of items in VS is 0.622-0.777. r of items in SB is 0.073-0.627, and r of item 31 is 0.073. r of items 3, 8, 12, 13, 17, and 31 are less than 0.300, and r of all the other items is greater than 0.300 (see Table 1). Then, item-total correlation is calculated (Hao and Hong, 2014).…”
Section: Project Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%