Resin-Retained Bridges as Predictable and Successful Restorations

Tredwin, Christopher; Setchell, DJ; George, Geoffrey St; Weisbloom, M

doi:10.1016/j.aodf.2007.04.006

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They provide a rapid, cost‐effective and predictable replacement option for the missing tooth (Tredwin et al . , Pjetursson et al . ).…”

Section: Extractionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Resin-bonded bridges provide a minimally invasive fixed replacement option for missing teeth that are well accepted by patients (Creugers & De Kanter 2000). They provide a rapid, cost-effective and predictable replacement option for the missing tooth (Tredwin et al 2007, Pjetursson et al 2008. When the enamel of the abutment tooth has been preserved during preparation and adequate occlusal coverage has been provided, resin-bonded bridges have been shown to have a median survival of 9.8 years (Djemal et al 1999).…”

Section: Resin-bonded Bridgesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

External cervical resorption: part 2 – management

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effective management of external cervical resorption (ECR) depends on accurate assessment of the true nature and accessibility of ECR; this has been discussed in part 1 of this 2 part article. This aim of this article was firstly, to review the literature in relation to the management of ECR and secondly, based on the available evidence, describe different strategies for the management of ECR. In cases where ECR is supracrestal, superficial and with limited circumferential spread, a surgical repair without root canal treatment is the preferred approach. With more extensive ECR lesions, vital pulp therapy or root canal treatment may also be indicated. Internal repair is indicated where there is limited resorptive damage to the external aspect of the tooth and/or where an external (surgical) approach is not possible due to the inaccessible nature of subcrestal ECR. In these cases, root canal treatment will also need to be carried out. Intentional reimplantation is indicated in cases where a surgical or internal approach is not practical. An atraumatic extraction technique and short extraoral period followed by 2-week splinting are important prognostic factors. Periodic reviews may be indicated in cases where active management is not pragmatic. Finally, extraction of the affected tooth may be the only option in untreatable cases where there are aesthetic, functional and/or symptomatic issues.

show abstract

“…They provide a rapid, cost‐effective and predictable replacement option for the missing tooth (Tredwin et al . , Pjetursson et al . ).…”

Section: Extractionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resin-bonded Bridgesmentioning

confidence: 99%

External cervical resorption: part 2 – management

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, managing expectations with regard to aesthetic outcome and longevity should be considered an important part of treatment planning. 13 If expectations are unrealistic, patient satisfaction with the final result is likely to be low.…”

Section: Case Selection I) Patient Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A wax up on articulated casts gives a valuable view from the palatal aspect aiding the assessment of the amount of interocclusal space available for the retainer wings and pontics. 13 It is important that the pontic is not involved in guidance during mandibular excursive movements. 16 If this is unachievable, guidance should be shared with other natural teeth.…”

Section: Iii) Occlusal Featuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resin bonded bridges: techniques for success

Durey

Nixon²,

Robinson

et al. 2011

Br Dent J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Resin-retained bridges (RRB) have been used clinically since the 1970s and offer a more conservative approach to the restoration of edentulous spaces than conventional bridgework. 24 Over the years techniques have been modifi ed to allow for better retention, life span and aesthetics. Nevertheless, some clinicians have shown some concerns regarding RRBs.…”

Section: Coronectomymentioning

confidence: 99%

Coronectomy – oral surgery's answer to modern day conservative dentistry

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Removal of mandibular third molars is a common oral surgery procedure which is associated with a significant risk of injury to the inferior dental nerve (IDN). In an era of conservative dentistry the technique of coronectomy, which is conservative in terms of surgery and successful in minimising the incidence of IDN injury, has been met with some resistance and has been deemed non-ideal and controversial by many oral surgeons. This article outlines the benefits of coronectomy and highlights some examples from other dental specialities that have embraced conservative principles, despite their detractors.

show abstract

Resin-Retained Bridges as Predictable and Successful Restorations

Cited by 9 publications

References 12 publications

External cervical resorption: part 2 – management

External cervical resorption: part 2 – management

Resin bonded bridges: techniques for success

Coronectomy – oral surgery's answer to modern day conservative dentistry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About