2015
DOI: 10.2110/palo.2014.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving Three-Dimensional and Subsurficial Features of Carbonaceous Compressions and Shelly Fossils Using Backscattered Electron Scanning Electron Microscopy (Bse-Sem)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, a variety of other tools has proven to be useful in this regard. Chief among these is scanning electron microscopy (SEM), especially in backscattered mode (BSE), which can reveal small‐scale morphological features not otherwise evident (Muscente & Xiao, ; Tang, Pang, Yuan, & Xiao, ). For example, detection of fusellae (microstructures of graptolite tubaria) in specimens assigned to Yuknessia from the Burgess Shale Formation and the Cambrian of Utah (Figure a,b) indicates that this taxon, long regarded as a macroalga, is actually a metazoan with a hemichordate affinity (LoDuca, Caron, Schiffbauer, Xiao, & Kramer ; Maletz & Steiner, ).…”
Section: A Synopsis Of Early Paleozoic Non‐calcified Macroalgal Fossilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, a variety of other tools has proven to be useful in this regard. Chief among these is scanning electron microscopy (SEM), especially in backscattered mode (BSE), which can reveal small‐scale morphological features not otherwise evident (Muscente & Xiao, ; Tang, Pang, Yuan, & Xiao, ). For example, detection of fusellae (microstructures of graptolite tubaria) in specimens assigned to Yuknessia from the Burgess Shale Formation and the Cambrian of Utah (Figure a,b) indicates that this taxon, long regarded as a macroalga, is actually a metazoan with a hemichordate affinity (LoDuca, Caron, Schiffbauer, Xiao, & Kramer ; Maletz & Steiner, ).…”
Section: A Synopsis Of Early Paleozoic Non‐calcified Macroalgal Fossilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical preparation such as sectioning or serial grinding may be employed 16 17 18 , but ultimately lead to the destruction of the material. This disadvantage is also shared by methods based on electron microscopy, such as focused ion beam electron microscopy 19 and multi-voltage back-scattered electron imaging 20 , which are additionally limited to small sample sizes, and non-intuitive to interpret. Recently, high resolution x-ray imaging became increasingly popular among palaeontologists for the non-destructive examination of fossils 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 .…”
Section: The Study Of Fossilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D–E, N–O). The green material appears brighter than the underlying shale in BSE‐SEM images, indicating that its minerals backscatter more electrons and therefore have a higher average Z value than the silicates in the shale (Muscente and Xiao ). EDS elemental maps show that the minerals in the fossil have higher concentrations of Fe and Mg and lower concentrations of Si and K than the silicates in the underlying shale (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All type specimens were photographed using standard reflected‐light photography techniques, and their morphologies, ultrastructures and preservational features were studied using a Hitachi TM3000 tabletop thermionic (tungsten filament source) SEM with polepiece BSE four‐array solid‐state detector and Bruker XFlash compact EDS detector housed in the Virginia Tech (VT) Department of Geosciences. All electron images were acquired at an accelerating voltage of 15 keV and working distance of 12 mm using the compositional (atomic number, or Z) contrast imaging mode (Muscente and Xiao ). Conductive coating was not deposited on the specimens prior to imaging, as this study made use of a low vacuum system in which the specimen chambers are held at pressures (~10 −2 torr) allowing for the ionization and electrical conduction of surface charge by gases (Taylor ; Taylor and Jones ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%