2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving three-dimensional surface displacements from InSAR measurements: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
210
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 355 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
210
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the side-looking imaging geometry of the current SAR sensors, the deformation in the LOS d LOS direction is actually the projection of the 3-D surface displacements in the vertical W, east U E , and north U N directions, according to the following equation [26,45]:…”
Section: Overview Of the Sip Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the side-looking imaging geometry of the current SAR sensors, the deformation in the LOS d LOS direction is actually the projection of the 3-D surface displacements in the vertical W, east U E , and north U N directions, according to the following equation [26,45]:…”
Section: Overview Of the Sip Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominant error source in the azimuth direction is mainly due to the following; mining-induced surface deformation is dominated by vertical subsidence, and the components in the east and north directions are generally much smaller than the vertical component, particularly in the central portion of a mining-induced deformation basin [32,44]. Given that the LOS deformation is also dominated by vertical subsidence [26], mining-related LOS deformation is usually much larger than the azimuth deformation. This causes a much higher possibility of the error offsets masking the azimuth deformation than in the LOS deformation, for SAR data with a nearly equal range and azimuth resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, these methods can be divided into four categories. (i) Integrating of InSAR and Offset-Tracking: Raucoules et al [47] obtained time-variable 3-D ground displacements fields in the La Valette landslide by combining the ascending and descending Offset-Tracking [48][49][50] and InSAR measurements. The temporal discrepancy between the different acquired times of SAR images from ascending and descending tracks is ignored by interpolating the displacement rates according to the images acquired epochs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vollrath et al [56] decomposed InSAR time-series deformation into 3-D with the assistance of GPS data in the case of low strain rates with the SISTEM. Obviously, this method is dependent on the number and distribution of the GPS sites, which are always limited by the high deployment and operational cost [50]. (iv) Neglecting of N-S (North-South) deformation: Ozawa and Ueda [57] estimated U-D (Up-Down) and E-W (East-West) time-series deformations in Miyake-jima by neglecting the contribution of N-S displacements on InSAR LOS measurements [58], and employed a smooth constraint of temporal displacement change to settle the problem of temporal discrepancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unit projection vector of LOS deformation for ascending and descending orbits are S asc " rs e , s n , s u s T " r´0.607,´0.170, 0.755s T and S des " rs e , s n , s u s T " r0.608,´0.168, 0.776s T , respectively. By assuming the north-south deformation is null and exploiting the projection vectors S asc and S des to establish observation equation, two dimensional (2D) deformations, i.e., east-west and up=down (or vertical) are derived by combing the D-InSAR and Offset Tracking measurements from ascending and descending orbits [35]. We acknowledge that neglecting the north-south deformation will induce errors in the east-west and vertical deformation estimation, but for the Illapel earthquake it might be very slim, because the azimuth deformation itself is very small.…”
Section: Precision Assessment and 2-d Displacement Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%