2019
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2018.2859262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving Ultrasound Contrast Microbubbles Using Minimum Variance Beamforming

Abstract: Minimum Variance (MV) beamforming is known to improve the lateral resolution of ultrasound images and enhance the separation of isolated point scatterers. This paper aims to evaluate the adaptive beamformer's performance with flowing microbubbles (MBs), which are relevant to super-resolution ultrasound imaging. Simulations using point scatterer data from single emissions were complemented by an experimental investigation performed using a capillary tube phantom and the Synthetic Aperture Real-time Ultrasound S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There exist multiple definitions of resolution ranging from the −3dB Rayleigh resolution criteria (Rayleigh 1879), to the Sparrow resolution defined as where the saddle point between the two peaks first develops -thus being a measure on separability. A brief review shows that many authors tend to use the FWHM (-6 dB) (Liebgott et al 2016;Matrone, Savoia, and Magenes 2015), while others use some measure of separability (Camacho, Parrilla, and Fritsch 2009;Jensen and Austeng 2014) while some use both (Diamantis et al 2019). We will have a brief look at both.…”
Section: Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist multiple definitions of resolution ranging from the −3dB Rayleigh resolution criteria (Rayleigh 1879), to the Sparrow resolution defined as where the saddle point between the two peaks first develops -thus being a measure on separability. A brief review shows that many authors tend to use the FWHM (-6 dB) (Liebgott et al 2016;Matrone, Savoia, and Magenes 2015), while others use some measure of separability (Camacho, Parrilla, and Fritsch 2009;Jensen and Austeng 2014) while some use both (Diamantis et al 2019). We will have a brief look at both.…”
Section: Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process can also be seen as an approximate estimation of the PSF. Note that it is accepted that the axial resolution is at best half the pulse length, 67 which in our case is 1 λ (514 μm), whereas the lateral resolution varies across the image depending on the beam width 67,68 and can be up to a few λ using the delay-and-sum beamfomers, 69 which are used here. The histogram of the MB echo size distribution from the sheep ovary is displayed in Figure 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that once 2 particles approach closer than a few wavelengths, they are likely to become larger in size before appearing as a merged particle in the image. 69…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesise that some adaptive beamforming algorithms may decrease the FWHM without increasing target separability. Some authors have included an analysis of separability when evaluating beamforming algorithms [1] [2] [3]. However, the consequences of using FWHM as a measure of resolution for adaptive beamformers could lead to the wrong conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%