Resource Allocation for Equity in the British National Health Service, 1948–89: An Advocacy Coalition Analysis of the RAWP

Abstract

Britain's National Health Service (NHS) is a universal, single-payer health system in which the central state has been instrumental in ensuring equity. This article investigates why from the 1970s a policy to achieve equal access for equal need was implemented. Despite the founding principle that the NHS should "universalize the best," this was a controversial policy goal, implying substantial redistribution from London and the South and threatening established medical, political, and bureaucratic interests. Our conceptual approach draws on the advocacy coalition framework (ACF), which foregrounds the influence of research and ideas in the policy process. We first outline the spatial inequities that the NHS inherited, the work of the Resource Allocation Working Party (RAWP), and its new redistributive formula. We then introduce the ACF approach, analyzing the RAWP's prehistory and formation in advocacy coalition terms, focusing particularly on the rise of health economics. Our explanation emphasizes the consensual commitment to equity, which relegated conflict to more technical questions of application. The "buy-in" of midlevel bureaucrats was central to the RAWP's successful alignment of equity with allocative efficiency. We contrast this with the failure of advocacy for equity of health outcomes: here consensus over core beliefs and technical solutions proved elusive.

Factors influencing customer citizenship behaviour in the hospitality industry

“…Nguyen et al (2014) has mainly considered two elements of CCB: customer feedback and advocacy. The feedback includes solicited and unsolicited information that comes from the customer, and advocacy refers to the recommendation to others that determines other customers (Gorsky and Millward 2018). Yi and Gong (2013) have added another dimension, which helps to assist other customers in meeting their specific requirements based on customers' earlier experiences.…”

From “Honeymoon Period” to “Stable Marriage”: The Rise of Management Consultants in British Health Policymaking

“…78 During the late 1980s Coopers and Lybrand were also involved in the review of the Resource Allocation Working Party (RAWP) formula-originally designed in 1976 to try to correct historical imbalances and bring about a more equitable distribution of funding throughout the NHS. 79 The role of management consultants continued to diversify and expand in the health care sphere therefore, and a wider range of firms were beginning to establish an important role at both local and national levels.…”

Placing the Public in Public Health in Post-War Britain, 1948–2012

“…The survey found that services were 'ad hoc and patchy' with 'no central guidelines and … no resources … made available either centrally or locally' (Prashar and Anionwu 1985, 50). SCD had been left out of the 1975 NHS Resource Allocation Working Party (an attempt to redistribute resources within the NHS) formula (Gorsky and Millward 2018).…”