2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10068-017-0220-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response surface optimization of conditions for debittering of white mahlab (Prunus mahaleb L.) juice using polystyrene resins

Abstract: In the current study, debittering of ( L.) juice using polystyrene resins was investigated and optimized using the Box-Behnken response surface methodology. The effects of independent variables including resin type (cation exchange resin, anion exchange resin, and 50:50 cation/anion exchange resin), resin dosage (0.05, 0.075, and 0.1 g/mL) and agitation speed (50, 150, and 250 rpm) on total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, total anthocyanin content (TAC), antioxidant activity, and bitterness of juice… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The operative conditions for the extractive procedure and experimental data of secondary metabolites quantification are described in paragraph 4.2. The total content of these metabolites in the extract is also consistent with the literature [ 32 ] and the scavenging and reducing activities depicted in Table 1 . The extract also showed inhibitory effects against different enzymes, namely AChE, BChE, tyrosinase, α-amylase and α-glucosidase ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The operative conditions for the extractive procedure and experimental data of secondary metabolites quantification are described in paragraph 4.2. The total content of these metabolites in the extract is also consistent with the literature [ 32 ] and the scavenging and reducing activities depicted in Table 1 . The extract also showed inhibitory effects against different enzymes, namely AChE, BChE, tyrosinase, α-amylase and α-glucosidase ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%