Response Time to Stimuli in Division I Soccer Players

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the effect of auditory stimuli (AS) and visual stimuli (VS) on sprint time, sprint speed, and reaction time in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I male soccer players. Fifteen healthy subjects (mean age 22.1 ± 1.6 years) volunteered for the study. This experiment was conducted on a regulation soccer field, using a wireless timing system. Subjects stood on a touch-and-release pad and were instructed a prompt (AS: "go" command via a microphone interface, VS: movement of a player located 10 m from the start) to run 20 m through the finish line timing gates without decelerating. After 3 submaximal sprint trials at 50%, conditions (AS and VS) were randomized and performed 3 times by each subject. The best sprint time, sprint speed, and reaction time were recorded. Paired t-tests were conducted on dependent variables to determine statistically significant differences. An alpha level was set at p ≤ 0.05. Sprint time was reduced in response to VS as compared to AS (3.76 ± 0.16 seconds vs. 3.85 ± 0.15 seconds, p = 0.001). Sprint speed (distance covered) was greater in VS compared to AS (5.3 ± 0.21 m · s vs. 5.1 ± 0.19 m · s, p < 0.001), and reaction time was reduced in VS compared to AS (0.53 ± 0.048 seconds vs. 0.61 ± 0.044 seconds, p = 0.001). These data show that VS rather than AS improve sprint response times in collegiate male soccer athletes. The data suggest that performance on the field may be improved if coaches and players strategize to integrate visual cues (e.g., gestures and signals) during practices and games.

Analysis of Balance, Rapidity, Force and Reaction Times of Soccer Players at Different Levels of Competition

“…However, the single comparisons between groups (Figure 10c,d and Figure 11c,d) highlight that no specific macro-groups can be identified, concerning reaction times. These insights are in contrast with recent findings [20,21], probably due to the small number of subjects analyzed in the mentioned studies.…”

“…It has been demonstrated that ART are less important than VRT in soccer, since it is essentially a visual game [20,21]. …”

Evaluation of the Pre-Planned and Non-Planed Agility Performance: Comparison between Individual and Team Sports

“…Neither individual nor team athletes encounter a light-based stimulus in their respective sport although track athletes, namely sprinters and hurdlers, need to instantaneously respond to the auditory signal of a starting pistol [22][23][24]. However, this is a simple stimulus compared with the more complex visual, auditory (verbal communication), and kinesthetic stimuli experienced by athletes when confronting an opponent [25][26][27][28][29]. Furthermore, the group of individual athletes also included tennis players and judokas who, like team athletes, react to the external stimuli generated by an opponent.…”

Simple reaction time: how it relates to body mass index (BMI), gender and handedness in Ghanaian students.

“…1 The measurement of reaction time has for a long time been of interest in certain sports such as the 100 m sprint in which reaction times (to the starter's gun) can be an important determinant of success, as races are often decided by hundredths of a second. 2,3 In more recent times RT has come to the fore in the area of assessing sports concussions, which has become a big issue in contact sports. 4 Various factors such as nutrition, training, age gender exercise, hand dominance and fatigue have been found to influence ones reaction time.…”