2019
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to Letter to the Editor: “Nomenclature for real‐time magnetic resonance imaging”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…illustrated by a gray shaded bar, with fine spatial resolution and coarse temporal resolution on the upper left (e.g. 1x1mm 2 with 80 ms temporal resolution, 12.5 fps), and coarse spatial resolution and fine temporal resolution on the right (e.g. 3.5x3.5mm with ms temporal resolution, 50 fps).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…illustrated by a gray shaded bar, with fine spatial resolution and coarse temporal resolution on the upper left (e.g. 1x1mm 2 with 80 ms temporal resolution, 12.5 fps), and coarse spatial resolution and fine temporal resolution on the right (e.g. 3.5x3.5mm with ms temporal resolution, 50 fps).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data consisted of multiple stacks of highly accelerated dynamic bSSFP imaging planes, with multiple time frames obtained for each slice. The temporal resolution of the acquisition (72 ms per frame) was sufficient to capture fetal cardiac motion in real-time without the requirement for periodic movement and electrocardiography-gating, however, note that the k-t SENSE acquisition itself was not interactive due to image reconstruction latency (on the order of minutes) 53 . The fetal heart rate was estimated from the frames of each acquired slice and used to assign cardiac phases to each successive frame.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization methods are inherently more computationally intensive than analytic approaches, and careful attention is needed to ensure that computation times are short enough to permit on‐the‐fly design while limiting delays due to latency 24 during patient‐specific protocol refinement 25 . Additionally, it is easy to check that a waveform meets all of the specified constraints imposed on the optimization, but it remains unclear if other constraints are needed.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%