2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resting state FDG-PET functional connectivity as an early biomarker of Alzheimer's disease using conjoint univariate and independent component analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
76
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(79 reference statements)
4
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, investigation of connectivity with (FDG-) PET has been considered as principally possible at a group level only. Yet, very recent evidence indicates encouraging properties of FDG-PET-based resting state connectivity at an individual level (Huang et al, 2010;Toussaint et al, 2012). To differentiate from functional connectivity as quantified with fMRI, here we use the term "metabolic connectivity" suggested by Lee et al (2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, investigation of connectivity with (FDG-) PET has been considered as principally possible at a group level only. Yet, very recent evidence indicates encouraging properties of FDG-PET-based resting state connectivity at an individual level (Huang et al, 2010;Toussaint et al, 2012). To differentiate from functional connectivity as quantified with fMRI, here we use the term "metabolic connectivity" suggested by Lee et al (2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, the sensitivity and specificity of [ 18 F]FDG PET (as well as of all AD biomarkers) depend largely on the method of interpretation, resulting in improved diagnostic and prognostic accuracy with software-aided reading [24]. In summary, we do not agree with the view of the authors of the Cochrane review that the variability in diagnostic performance represents the main limitation in the use of [ [41,42]. Three of these 19 studies used a normal reference population as the source of normative data, an approach that was not considered in the Cochrane review [38,39,41].…”
Section: Results Of the Cochrane Reviewmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Pattern recognition techniques can therefore be used to extract these patterns and to quantify their salience. This approach can be based on summing or averaging indices that measure deviation from normal (e.g., z or t scores) in brain regions that are typically affected in AD [31,32], or by multivariate techniques employing principal component analysis, independent component analysis, or machine learning [33][34][35][36]. Some of these measures have already been validated for use in multicentre studies (e.g., NEST-DD, ADNI) [37,38].…”
Section: Quantification Of Fdg Pet Studies In Dementiamentioning
confidence: 99%