“…The clinical effectiveness of different retainer designs has been subject to surprisingly few randomized controlled trials (Littlewood et al, 2006a(Littlewood et al, , 2006b. The available literature indicates that more settling, as measured by an increase in the number of occlusal contacts, is reported to occur with a Hawley-style retainer (Basciftci et al, 2007) than an Essix retainer (Sauget et al, 1997).…”
The objective of this report is to describe an original retainer design for retention following orthodontic treatment in cleft lip and palate patients in order to improve the aesthetics of anterior maxillary dentoalveolar cleft defects. The technique incorporates features of both traditional and modern retainer design. The advantages of the technique and fabrication process are described.
“…The clinical effectiveness of different retainer designs has been subject to surprisingly few randomized controlled trials (Littlewood et al, 2006a(Littlewood et al, , 2006b. The available literature indicates that more settling, as measured by an increase in the number of occlusal contacts, is reported to occur with a Hawley-style retainer (Basciftci et al, 2007) than an Essix retainer (Sauget et al, 1997).…”
The objective of this report is to describe an original retainer design for retention following orthodontic treatment in cleft lip and palate patients in order to improve the aesthetics of anterior maxillary dentoalveolar cleft defects. The technique incorporates features of both traditional and modern retainer design. The advantages of the technique and fabrication process are described.
“…The occurrence of failures in fixed retainers is highly variable [5][6][7], ranging from 31.7% to 5.9% [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Many studies in the literature have shown failures and unexpected tooth position changes, such as a torque difference between two adjacent mandibular incisors and an increased buccal inclination and movement of one mandibular canine [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of sufficient research data for evidence-based guidelines and the need for randomized clinical and in vitro studies were highlighted by the Cochrane Review published in 2006 [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La revue Cochrane, en 2006[5], a bien mis en evidence l'insuffisance des donn ees de recherches, qui ne permettent pas l' elaboration de recommandations fond ees sur des preuves, et le besoin d'essais cliniques randomis es ainsi que des etudes in vitro. Nous avons donc d ecid e d' etudier l'interface[14,15] entre diff erents fils et composites et en particulier la force de r etention entre les fils et les composites en effectuant des tests de traction.…”
“…Present studies on the use of fixed retainers mainly concern the effectiveness, success and failure rate of a bonded retainer and oral hygiene aspects of different types of fixed retention. In the literature, there is one Cochrane review available summarizing the results of randomized and quasirandomized controlled trials on this topic [8]. The quality of trials on retention was not thorough enough for a true conclusion to be drawn.…”
Retention type and, occasionally, an increase in intercanine width influence anterior teeth wear post-treatment. However, the clinical significance and impact of the examined retention methods on occlusal wear are small.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.